I agree with both sets of views. It's not her business but on the other hand for those of us that do tell the truth its seems wrong. No different to a lot of the fraudulent "whiplash claims" that keep being given as an excuse for our car insurance premiums going up. Its a tricky one.
A friend of mine recently sold her horse with full vet history and claim history disclosed. She has recently found out the the horse has been insured but with no mention of of it having any claims history - i.e. it has no exclusions listed on the policy.
Has anyone any advice - for example...
Thank you for such a comprehensive reply. I'm interested to know whether if investigations find something but there is no veterinary or documentary evidence to show that this could be classed as pre-existing or even known about how can a purchaser like myself reasonably expect a seller to have...
Thank you everyone - I have to agree with your comments. It was suggested to me that under the new Consumer Regulations I had 6 months to request a refund if I could find a cause, and it was the dealer's responsibility to prove that the "cause" was not pre-existing regardless of whether it was...
I bought a horse from a dealer with no vetting. I know - not a brilliant thing to do. Now four months into ownership and although the horse isn't lame he just is not right. Thinking of having investigative work done, but not sure where I stand regarding return/refund if a problem is...