PaddyMonty
Well-Known Member
I have always believed very strongly in that saying, particularly where horses are concerned but am now having to re-evaluate that belief.
I recently tried jumping Otto in a hackamore. Well this change was due to me trying to find a combination that would allow his owner to jump him. The problem is that if he has even the slightest contact on his mouth over a fence he explodes on landing. Hence trying bitless.
Now the thing is, I dont have any real problem jumping him in a bit. He is improving all the time as his trust in me not to touch his mouth grows.
So if it was just me jumping him I would never have tried the hackamore (aint broke).
But, I think the bitless route is probably the best solution for him when I'm jumping aswell. He's much calmer making the job more enjoyable for both of us.
So the problem is, is the 'ain't broke - don't fix it' rule a good one?
Are those that follow it missing out on an even better performance by not experimenting significantly?
Are we really sure we dont have a problem?
Your thoughts............
I recently tried jumping Otto in a hackamore. Well this change was due to me trying to find a combination that would allow his owner to jump him. The problem is that if he has even the slightest contact on his mouth over a fence he explodes on landing. Hence trying bitless.
Now the thing is, I dont have any real problem jumping him in a bit. He is improving all the time as his trust in me not to touch his mouth grows.
So if it was just me jumping him I would never have tried the hackamore (aint broke).
But, I think the bitless route is probably the best solution for him when I'm jumping aswell. He's much calmer making the job more enjoyable for both of us.
So the problem is, is the 'ain't broke - don't fix it' rule a good one?
Are those that follow it missing out on an even better performance by not experimenting significantly?
Are we really sure we dont have a problem?
Your thoughts............