Birker2020
Well-Known Member
About six weeks ago my horse was shod by my usual farrier who I have used for the past 3.5 years. My vet highly rates him as his work is very good, and is one of the preferred farriers my vet recommends.
Two days after being shod Bailey became lame. Whilst ridden he was sound but between getting off and untacking him he showed lameness which gradually increased overnight. The next day I took him to my vets (he was due an assessment for his suspensory injury anyway). The vet said he thought he had an abcess and found a badly bruised sole where he thinks the farrier may have attempted to put a nail in and then realised for whatever reason it was placed wrongly and took it out again. Alternatively the vet said he may have stood on a stone (maybe following our ride) - I am guessing the vet didnt want to implicate the farrier. Anyway a day of wet poultice followed by two days of dry and five days of iodine mixed with sugar on the foot and the horse was fine and had a shoe back on.
Roll on five weeks and my horse is shod again. Later that day I go up the yard after work to find my horse with a swollen warm leg and seeing his rug in his stable think hes got tangled up in it.So I treated it with icing (ice cup and ice boots) and bandaging and bute. Vet due four days later for flu and tet and the horse getting slightly lamer every day. Asked the vet to just squeeze foot with pincers in case it was the shoeing again and low and behold the horse was very reactive. The vet took the shoe off and pared away the horse was in a lot of pain and it was very difficult to see him in the state he was in, even though he was hurting he never made any attempt to bite the vet like most horses would have, he just kept turning his head to look at him to say excuse me but you are rather hurting me! Anyway out comes blood and here we are today, day two of poulticing and another seven days box rest.
Spoke to farrier who was very apologetic but feels he hasnt done anything different either time and was convinced the first abcess wasnt his fault. He did say he would reimburse me (presumably meant shoeing cost) but when I asked my vet if I should ditch him he said no he felt it wasnt his fault and my horses walls of his feet are quite thin and he thinks he is finding it difficult to keep shoes on. All very well and good but its cost me about £220 quid so far in vets bills!
I really want to keep the farrier as Ive had about 35 shoeings with him now, he is very good at his job and tries his hardest to balance Bails feet due to his various issues, and I have never had a problem before seven weeks ago with the first abcess.
What would you do, keep or ditch? And would you use Keratex hoof hardener or go with the long term biotin supplement vet says this will take 12 months to take affect.
Double chocca mocha and slice of mud pie for getting this far!
Two days after being shod Bailey became lame. Whilst ridden he was sound but between getting off and untacking him he showed lameness which gradually increased overnight. The next day I took him to my vets (he was due an assessment for his suspensory injury anyway). The vet said he thought he had an abcess and found a badly bruised sole where he thinks the farrier may have attempted to put a nail in and then realised for whatever reason it was placed wrongly and took it out again. Alternatively the vet said he may have stood on a stone (maybe following our ride) - I am guessing the vet didnt want to implicate the farrier. Anyway a day of wet poultice followed by two days of dry and five days of iodine mixed with sugar on the foot and the horse was fine and had a shoe back on.
Roll on five weeks and my horse is shod again. Later that day I go up the yard after work to find my horse with a swollen warm leg and seeing his rug in his stable think hes got tangled up in it.So I treated it with icing (ice cup and ice boots) and bandaging and bute. Vet due four days later for flu and tet and the horse getting slightly lamer every day. Asked the vet to just squeeze foot with pincers in case it was the shoeing again and low and behold the horse was very reactive. The vet took the shoe off and pared away the horse was in a lot of pain and it was very difficult to see him in the state he was in, even though he was hurting he never made any attempt to bite the vet like most horses would have, he just kept turning his head to look at him to say excuse me but you are rather hurting me! Anyway out comes blood and here we are today, day two of poulticing and another seven days box rest.
Spoke to farrier who was very apologetic but feels he hasnt done anything different either time and was convinced the first abcess wasnt his fault. He did say he would reimburse me (presumably meant shoeing cost) but when I asked my vet if I should ditch him he said no he felt it wasnt his fault and my horses walls of his feet are quite thin and he thinks he is finding it difficult to keep shoes on. All very well and good but its cost me about £220 quid so far in vets bills!
I really want to keep the farrier as Ive had about 35 shoeings with him now, he is very good at his job and tries his hardest to balance Bails feet due to his various issues, and I have never had a problem before seven weeks ago with the first abcess.
What would you do, keep or ditch? And would you use Keratex hoof hardener or go with the long term biotin supplement vet says this will take 12 months to take affect.
Double chocca mocha and slice of mud pie for getting this far!