katelarge
Well-Known Member
OK, so I got my insurance renewal forms through today and was a bit taken aback to see my horse has an exclusion on his pelvis that I was unaware of! I put in a claim last October, when he was unlevel behind, My usual vets were rubbish and kept saying they couldn't figure out what it was, and he'd need bone scans, etc.
I decided to get a second opinion, and this vet came out, diagnosed a pelvic rotation, which was helped by some on-the-spot chiro, and followup visits from a back person who the vet referred me to.
Now, the second-opinion vet wrote a treatment report, of which the last paragrpah reads" I do not believe that there will be any lasting legacy as a result of this pelvic rotation which is a common occurance in horses that is adequately maintained through regular chiropractic or osteopathis treatment. ***There should be no reason to include any exclusions on XXX for insurance purposes***."
Notice the last sentence? So what did they do? Slap an exclusion on him, without telling me and totally ignoring the vets advice!!!
I called them and they say the best they can do is for me to pay for another visit from the vet, and for them to say THE SAME THING AGAIN!! Then they MIGHT take off the exclusion! Does anyone else not get this? How do they decide to put on exclusions if not by veterinary advice? And the vet's report was pretty back and white!
I tell you what, I have a good mind to go elsewhere now! Seriously hacked off!
I decided to get a second opinion, and this vet came out, diagnosed a pelvic rotation, which was helped by some on-the-spot chiro, and followup visits from a back person who the vet referred me to.
Now, the second-opinion vet wrote a treatment report, of which the last paragrpah reads" I do not believe that there will be any lasting legacy as a result of this pelvic rotation which is a common occurance in horses that is adequately maintained through regular chiropractic or osteopathis treatment. ***There should be no reason to include any exclusions on XXX for insurance purposes***."
Notice the last sentence? So what did they do? Slap an exclusion on him, without telling me and totally ignoring the vets advice!!!
I called them and they say the best they can do is for me to pay for another visit from the vet, and for them to say THE SAME THING AGAIN!! Then they MIGHT take off the exclusion! Does anyone else not get this? How do they decide to put on exclusions if not by veterinary advice? And the vet's report was pretty back and white!
I tell you what, I have a good mind to go elsewhere now! Seriously hacked off!