not_with_it
Well-Known Member
Do you think, or have you noticed a difference in scores in different regions?
The reason I ask is because judges in my area seem to have a reputation for marking low. A lot of the competitions I go to you really have to earn your marks, but when I travel abit further out my marks seem to improve. Certain judges dont seem to like to give over 60% and a lot of the time the winner hasnt even gained a qualifying score.
A friend of mine competed locally and was gaining around 63%. She then went further south and gained nearly 70% on the same horse. The horse didnt go any different to what he usually does. They all get the same training to become a judge so surely there shouldnt be such a big gap.
Is it that the quality of horses is better down south and so people gain higher marks, or is it just that people up north are crap?
The reason I ask is because judges in my area seem to have a reputation for marking low. A lot of the competitions I go to you really have to earn your marks, but when I travel abit further out my marks seem to improve. Certain judges dont seem to like to give over 60% and a lot of the time the winner hasnt even gained a qualifying score.
A friend of mine competed locally and was gaining around 63%. She then went further south and gained nearly 70% on the same horse. The horse didnt go any different to what he usually does. They all get the same training to become a judge so surely there shouldnt be such a big gap.
Is it that the quality of horses is better down south and so people gain higher marks, or is it just that people up north are crap?