MissTyc
Well-Known Member
Very long story very short
-- herd grazing, field rotation but not always rested as long as ideal (3-4 months rather than 4-6). Healthy herd, mix of competition and leisure horses
-- high redworm burden end summer - egg count
-- horses wormed Equest (Pramox, to also cover tape) September
-- two cases of encysted redworm eruption / mass migration less than 15 weeks after worming
-- both died - one because of late diagnosis and one due to complications during treatment (stopped eating and colicked)
-- vet advised use Equest again, so horses wormed Equest early January (all weighed, correct dosage + 20%)
-- resistance test done by westgate labs
-- herd "no resistance detected" other than 3 horses identified as low (100-150 epg)
-- lab recommends 5-day Panacur to address Equest resistance problems right now on basis that if any eggs found during resistance testing, then likely there are also encysted chaps still present. Lab believes encysted redworm greater risk than resistance right here and now
-- vet recommends NOT to worm now as more worming might contribute to resistance issues, doesn't appear concerned about remaining encysted chaps in the 3 horses. Vet believes resistance greater risk than encysted worms at this stage
Owners are confused! Owners are aware of wide-spread Panacur resistance. But are also concerned about apparent Equest-resistance. Owners generally not sure where to turn right now. Worried about the 3 horses in case they are harbouring resistance worms. Definitely don't want to add to resistance, also definitely don't want to risk the health of the herd or any individual within it. Trying to improve worm counting, worming and rotation. Everyone has an opinion - imposable to see the wood for the trees, feel free to add yours!
-- herd grazing, field rotation but not always rested as long as ideal (3-4 months rather than 4-6). Healthy herd, mix of competition and leisure horses
-- high redworm burden end summer - egg count
-- horses wormed Equest (Pramox, to also cover tape) September
-- two cases of encysted redworm eruption / mass migration less than 15 weeks after worming
-- both died - one because of late diagnosis and one due to complications during treatment (stopped eating and colicked)
-- vet advised use Equest again, so horses wormed Equest early January (all weighed, correct dosage + 20%)
-- resistance test done by westgate labs
-- herd "no resistance detected" other than 3 horses identified as low (100-150 epg)
-- lab recommends 5-day Panacur to address Equest resistance problems right now on basis that if any eggs found during resistance testing, then likely there are also encysted chaps still present. Lab believes encysted redworm greater risk than resistance right here and now
-- vet recommends NOT to worm now as more worming might contribute to resistance issues, doesn't appear concerned about remaining encysted chaps in the 3 horses. Vet believes resistance greater risk than encysted worms at this stage
Owners are confused! Owners are aware of wide-spread Panacur resistance. But are also concerned about apparent Equest-resistance. Owners generally not sure where to turn right now. Worried about the 3 horses in case they are harbouring resistance worms. Definitely don't want to add to resistance, also definitely don't want to risk the health of the herd or any individual within it. Trying to improve worm counting, worming and rotation. Everyone has an opinion - imposable to see the wood for the trees, feel free to add yours!