Firewell
Well-Known Member
I was thinking this the other day.
How many of us (myself included!!) when looking to buy/loan a horse say we want a perfectly safe horse in every way. E.g Must not buck, rear, bolt, nap. Must be good to shoe, box, clip, catch. Horse must be safe and suited for a novice if neccessary.
I am no Novice, I consider myself a compatent amature, im not the bravest however so I steer away from adverts that say 'not novice ride' thinking that the horse must be quirky in some way.
How many of us actually end up with a horse that really is 100% in all situations??
I wanted a horse that fufills the above criteria. However iv'e ended up with a rising 5 yr old TB, who you couldn't consider him a novice ride as he is a young blood horse and he will have his moments. I can cope with these moments though, they arent dangerous.. just babyness. He may have the odd nap or the occassional small buck in canter.. he's spooked every now and again and tried to run off but iv'e stopped him. Nothing more than you would expect really.
My friends horse is an 18yr old. She really is as perfect as you would expect any schoolmistress to be but she still spooked the other day and nearly had my friend off. My old 26yr old gentleman could still stick in a buck!
I guess my point is that when going to view potential horses we say we want 'perfection' but does perfection ever really exist in horses? I think every horse is a large, living creature with its own mind so has the potential to be dangerous. Even the oldest, cobbiest angel in the world must still react to things.. they arent machines after all.
I just wonder wether 'must not buck' means 1. 'of course I dont expect it to go through its whole life with out having at least 1 or 2 bunny hops, but I dont want a serial bucker whos aim is to make me fall off' or does it mean 2. 'horse must not buck, must never even lift its hind legs. ever.'
Thoughts? Also if you are of the 2nd school of thought, should you be having a horse?
How many of us (myself included!!) when looking to buy/loan a horse say we want a perfectly safe horse in every way. E.g Must not buck, rear, bolt, nap. Must be good to shoe, box, clip, catch. Horse must be safe and suited for a novice if neccessary.
I am no Novice, I consider myself a compatent amature, im not the bravest however so I steer away from adverts that say 'not novice ride' thinking that the horse must be quirky in some way.
How many of us actually end up with a horse that really is 100% in all situations??
I wanted a horse that fufills the above criteria. However iv'e ended up with a rising 5 yr old TB, who you couldn't consider him a novice ride as he is a young blood horse and he will have his moments. I can cope with these moments though, they arent dangerous.. just babyness. He may have the odd nap or the occassional small buck in canter.. he's spooked every now and again and tried to run off but iv'e stopped him. Nothing more than you would expect really.
My friends horse is an 18yr old. She really is as perfect as you would expect any schoolmistress to be but she still spooked the other day and nearly had my friend off. My old 26yr old gentleman could still stick in a buck!
I guess my point is that when going to view potential horses we say we want 'perfection' but does perfection ever really exist in horses? I think every horse is a large, living creature with its own mind so has the potential to be dangerous. Even the oldest, cobbiest angel in the world must still react to things.. they arent machines after all.
I just wonder wether 'must not buck' means 1. 'of course I dont expect it to go through its whole life with out having at least 1 or 2 bunny hops, but I dont want a serial bucker whos aim is to make me fall off' or does it mean 2. 'horse must not buck, must never even lift its hind legs. ever.'
Thoughts? Also if you are of the 2nd school of thought, should you be having a horse?