Calf savaged and disembowled by a pack of hunting hounds?

Xlthlx · 6 January 2010

OR NOT .......

This is CLASSIC propaganda from LACS

http://cruelsports.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/image-of-the-day-53/#comment-150

They claim their hunt monitors saw the calf being killed by a pack. Why did they not film it? they film everything else.

Why did they not take a picture of it freshly killed but come back several days ;later?

These people are liars.

Patches · 6 January 2010

Bet it was a fox!

If we have a still born calf you can guarantee that foxes or feral cats will have dined on it before the disposal man gets here, generally the following morning.

Xlthlx · 6 January 2010

Exactly! and can you imagine the hunt all standing round watching the hounds eat the calf they have just killed while the LACS monitors watch as well?

Such blatant lies!

cptrayes · 6 January 2010

I find it very difficult to believe that not one LACS person there had a mobile phone with a camera on it. Impossible, in fact. That calf had been dead a long time before they pictured it.

The hunting debate is not helped by nonsense like this, is it?

Xlthlx · 6 January 2010

Indeed it isn't cptrayes and let's not forget that it is these monitors and this organisation that claim that 66% of hunts are breaking the law. It's quite obvious that they are telling porkies re the calf, how are we to believe the rest of what they say?

This is the problem with lying, it undermines one's credibility don't you think?

rosie fronfelen · 6 January 2010

this is as you say, a load of codswallop- do the LACS really think that this story is to be believed?once a liar always a liar,trouble is, what can one believe in what they say?doesn't help their cause-!!

levantosh · 6 January 2010

No pack of hounds would dare touch anything that isn't a fox (unless dead already!) the packs that I hunt with if the hounds so much as go after a hare there is someone on the hounds gathering them back up.
Hunt sabs need to sod off and let us get on with enjoying our sport and meeting up with our friends.

fatfurrycobs · 6 January 2010

We all know this is a load of nonsense, but if they actually did see this happen, why would they stand back and watch? And if it's ok to stand back & watch the hounds to kill & eat a calf, why is it so wrong for the fox? A little hypocritical me thinks ??!!

rosie fronfelen · 6 January 2010

we've had hounds shot on the spot for savaging ewes, it was years back, but no hunt will tolerate this sort of thing. it just shows the ignorance of the sabs/LACS.

Xlthlx · 6 January 2010

Yeap and how casually and incompetently they lie. They know they have dropped a clanger - a friend of mine from facebook left a comment about how obvious it is and they have refused to publish it.

MontyandZoom · 6 January 2010

Erm......I've only been hunting 4 times in my life, all post-ban.

Every time i've been, there has been some balaclava-wearing yobs following us and capturing our every move on film. I therefore find it extremely hard to believe that none of them had a camera on them!

Tiggy1 · 6 January 2010

Foxes or farm dogs etc etc
Wouldn't have thought hounds would do that.

JanetGeorge · 6 January 2010

It's quite obvious that they are telling porkies re the calf, how are we to believe the rest of what they say?

This is the problem with lying, it undermines one's credibility don't you think?

You're right - but the problem is that they get a headline!! I recall one notorious incident (which was actually very helpful in persuading the then CE of the LACS that his colleagues were liars and cheats) when LACS video APPEARED to show hounds pulling a stag down. The video stopped JUST before a hound took a bite (Oh YEAH!)

Fortunately the incident had also been filmed by a hunt supporter who DIDN'T cut his film at the split second hounds (unable to stop) ran OVER the stag which had fallen due to huge quantities of wire trailing from its antlers (the reason it was hunted - it was in a bad way).

Hounds never touched the stag except for a few which momentarily touched it with their feet as they ran over it - stopping 20 yards on!

So the LACS video was a total lie. Unfortunately, they got it on the news and we didn't get the supporter's footage until the next day. By then it was too late - it was old news!

Xlthlx · 6 January 2010

Some classic quotes on facebook from antis claiming that this is the hunts are using a loophole in the Act because it only bans hunting a WILD animal.

scotia2k7 · 6 January 2010

Firstly I dont hunt (although worked in hunt kennels when I was ooh, 17 & am 37 now). I can appreciate various points of view to hunting, but was & will always be anti-ban. These types of claims, (which in good faith we click in & then discuss in forums like this) only suffuce to further advertise these groups.

If a link such as this has no video to back it up, best idea (IMO) is to ignore it & not give it any discussion or airtime.

scotia

Serenity087 · 7 January 2010

If that was killed and torn apart by hounds... why is it still intact?

Antis love telling us how they're ripped apart... but that quite clearly hasn't been.

So, if it was killed by hounds... does this mean they really kill cleanly?

Oh dear, what a situation... someone is definantly lying!

Xlthlx · 7 January 2010

I disagree scotia where they are clearly lying they should be outed. This casts doubt on other claims they make and does LACS no favours.

muffinino · 7 January 2010

They claim their hunt monitors saw the calf being killed by a pack. Why did they not film it? they film everything else.

Why did they not take a picture of it freshly killed but come back several days ;later?

Because they're talking shite and it didn't happen?

These people are liars.

QFT

MrWoof · 7 January 2010

i'd love to know how they killed a new (probably still ) born calf and eat it to that extent ?

Simply due to the fact that they did not - and never would. Thee and me very well know that a pack of hounds would never riot in this way.

montmol · 7 January 2010

It would take a while to do that much 'damage' to the calf, hounds would not have long enough to eat it to that extent, as the master would surley have caught up with them by then! And no hunt can afford to have hounds that go round attacking farm animals, as we need to keep the farmers on our side!!!

countrygirl45 · 7 January 2010

we need to keep the farmers on our side!!!

Nice to see that some hunters think that - shame they all don't!!!!

cbeebies · 7 January 2010

I could be wrong but i agree that the calf does look long dead but also looks like it has no eyes, so if it wasnt the crows that got them, then hounds are getting very smart nowadays!! :shocked:

montmol · 11 January 2010

we need to keep the farmers on our side!!!

Click to expand...

Nice to see that some hunters think that - shame they all don't!!!!

I know, Im a farmers daughter, and have grown up being taught that whilst you are hunting, you are a guest on someone else's land. I think lots of people forget this!! Without the farmers we couldnt hunt, so we must not forget them.

MrWoof · 19 January 2010

No Farmers and Landowners = no Hunting.
Respect their land, fences and gates at all times please.

combat_claire · 20 January 2010

Hear Hear

Calf savaged and disembowled by a pack of hunting hounds?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New User

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member