Horsewitterer
Member
Hi there,
I'm a bit of a lurker on this forum if I'm honest!
I've been on here a bit lately as I've come across quite a few threads regarding Solution saddles over recent months. I've been considering these saddles for some time - in fact 3 years ago I tried a Solution GP, but was concerned as the gullet seemed narrow and the panels were resting on the bony part of my horse's withers at the sides.
However I've been advised that the newer Smart saddles have flexible panels and move more with the horse so may put my mind at ease as regards gullet width and spinal pressure....?
The reason I'm interested in treeless saddles generally is I have a few issues with my horse's treed saddle tipping off to the right at the back and dropping down to the left at the front - kind of ends up on a diagonal. She has some minor atrophy - barely visible compared with the atrophy you see on some horses, but I know it's there. Last summer she also had back pain in the areas where the saddle tips off to.
Physio reckons it's happening because of the way my horse moves (she is sound) but she kind of swings me to the right and causes my right hip to collapse.
I've had advice of an experienced saddle fitter and am using shims to try to correct the saddle movement which has helped a bit. Physio thought her back was much better in January, but I still think I could do better for my horse than her current totally inflexible treed saddle. In terms of treeless brands, the Solution seems to stand out in terms of performance (& price
!!).
I find my saddle uncomfortable after longer rides and get pain in my right hip sometimes. My horse is generally grumpy to tack up (although oddly she's being v good at the mo) but I'd struggle to tack her up without the distraction of a haynet!
I've noticed there seem to be a fair few people on here who've purchased Solution saddles relatively recently and I just wondered if people were still happy with their purchase? Would also be interested to hear from anyone who's had issues with the width of the gullets...
Also, if there happens to be anyone in the Worcestershire area who'd be happy to let me have a peek at their Smart saddle, that would be fabulous!
Thanks for reading.
I'm a bit of a lurker on this forum if I'm honest!
However I've been advised that the newer Smart saddles have flexible panels and move more with the horse so may put my mind at ease as regards gullet width and spinal pressure....?
The reason I'm interested in treeless saddles generally is I have a few issues with my horse's treed saddle tipping off to the right at the back and dropping down to the left at the front - kind of ends up on a diagonal. She has some minor atrophy - barely visible compared with the atrophy you see on some horses, but I know it's there. Last summer she also had back pain in the areas where the saddle tips off to.
Physio reckons it's happening because of the way my horse moves (she is sound) but she kind of swings me to the right and causes my right hip to collapse.
I've had advice of an experienced saddle fitter and am using shims to try to correct the saddle movement which has helped a bit. Physio thought her back was much better in January, but I still think I could do better for my horse than her current totally inflexible treed saddle. In terms of treeless brands, the Solution seems to stand out in terms of performance (& price
I find my saddle uncomfortable after longer rides and get pain in my right hip sometimes. My horse is generally grumpy to tack up (although oddly she's being v good at the mo) but I'd struggle to tack her up without the distraction of a haynet!
I've noticed there seem to be a fair few people on here who've purchased Solution saddles relatively recently and I just wondered if people were still happy with their purchase? Would also be interested to hear from anyone who's had issues with the width of the gullets...
Also, if there happens to be anyone in the Worcestershire area who'd be happy to let me have a peek at their Smart saddle, that would be fabulous!
Thanks for reading.