Conformation critique please?

Erm, ok. So both seem a little croup high, but that could be due to bum being closer to the camera. Number one has good looking legs to me, nice and strong looking, but rather weak neck.

Number two is lacking topline - there doesn't seem to be much muscle on his back. I can't remember the word, but the leg area between the hock and the stifle is too long and striaght for my liking. He also has rather long cannon bones/shank at the back, which suggests weak legs.

Both have a good depth of girth, and lovely shiny coats :)


Of course I am a complete amateur, so I wouldn't worry about anything I say :p
 
Heehee cheers! I was/am genuinely interested, because I only do the odd show class when they usually do their utmost to make us look like fools. But considering they were both gifts I don't think I did too bad!
I was offered another TB too, but I turned him down due to really poor feet, I can cope with odd shaped horses but they need good feet at least!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top