Do you know this woman

I know what she did was wrong but if she did it in broad daylight and with cctv there was it really that bad? At least it was outside a rescue and not on the side of a motorway or thrown in a sack off a bridge.

Especially if as someone has said the rescue charges to take a dog in, perhaps she couldn't afford it?
 
Jodie Ive thought that as well, several people on fb agree but they are saying the dog was very loosely tied and could have escaped and been killed/injured in an accident or caused one.
 
Working with a dog rescue, I would rather someone did this than continue to keep a dog they couldn't afford/handle/care for.

Personally, I think the rescue trying to identify her put them in quite a bad light, and it certainly won't encourage others to make the very difficult- but ultimately responsible - decision to either sign a dog over, or leave it at the gates.
 
Agree with other posters - and this is no criticism of you OP - the dog came to no harm and is now safe in rescue, I don't see the point in wasting valuable time and resources trying to track the woman down TBH.
It's a common thing here and why a lot of rescues didn't use to publicise their addresses but better tied up outside than some other outcomes.
 
Given how some dogs are dumped (chucked from moving cars....weighed down with barbell weights and chucked in rivers....) I would say that woman did the right thing. She took her dog to a rescue. Could have gone one better and taken him in and given a bit of history, but she may have thought they would not take the dog if they were full.
Not an ideal world, but far more responsible than some others.
 
I know what she did was wrong but if she did it in broad daylight and with cctv there was it really that bad? At least it was outside a rescue and not on the side of a motorway or thrown in a sack off a bridge.

Especially if as someone has said the rescue charges to take a dog in, perhaps she couldn't afford it?

I agree.
 
Top