kaiserchief
Well-Known Member
I've been following the Lucky saga and in my personal opinion and from what I've read on the buyer's page, Trina has been supportive. The buyer has been very unlucky and would have been well within her rights to return him for a full refund when his tumour became apparent but she decided to keep him and treat him. If, as Trina says, there were no physical symptoms while he was in her care (and she did have him for months) and he was in full work with no issues, plus vetted, how could she have known?
Someone else did point out that within a day or two of arriving with the new owner he broke a gate and a fence and could easily have triggered the nosebleeds when he had those accidents. If those incidents hadn't happened, the tumour may have gone undetected for years.
Someone else did point out that within a day or two of arriving with the new owner he broke a gate and a fence and could easily have triggered the nosebleeds when he had those accidents. If those incidents hadn't happened, the tumour may have gone undetected for years.