ForeverBroke_
Well-Known Member
Possibly an obvious musing really, but I just wondered whether lameness always means pain, or could it also be more as its perhaps a way of compensating for something else and therefore not painful?
I only ask as my horse is currently lame on both hinds (has had full work up at vets to suggest PSD and other issue as nerve blocks didn't make him sound). No treatment really is viable for him as he is also inconsistent infront with bilateral high articular ringbone, collat. damage and arthritis, and so it wouldn't be worth the neurectomy etc etc. I've opted to retire him regardless (he was a hack through summer) but he'll be reassessed in 3 months to see whats what.
Is him being lame essentially for the next 3 months at least therefore meaning he's in pain? Should I be doing more? CAN I do more?! He potters to/from the field ok and he's still happy to canter and squeal up the field. He's also having remedial shoeing so perhaps this will help things, but we'll see!
I dont know if I'm making sense, I'm a bit in over my head with it all again.

Any reasoning much appreciated.
I only ask as my horse is currently lame on both hinds (has had full work up at vets to suggest PSD and other issue as nerve blocks didn't make him sound). No treatment really is viable for him as he is also inconsistent infront with bilateral high articular ringbone, collat. damage and arthritis, and so it wouldn't be worth the neurectomy etc etc. I've opted to retire him regardless (he was a hack through summer) but he'll be reassessed in 3 months to see whats what.
Is him being lame essentially for the next 3 months at least therefore meaning he's in pain? Should I be doing more? CAN I do more?! He potters to/from the field ok and he's still happy to canter and squeal up the field. He's also having remedial shoeing so perhaps this will help things, but we'll see!
I dont know if I'm making sense, I'm a bit in over my head with it all again.
Any reasoning much appreciated.