Eventing2022
Well-Known Member
Hello all
I'm all for making horses comfortable and not in pain, but where does this cross the line into unethical treatment? I suspect there is no easy answer.
I know of a 6yo horse. Chondromalacia diagnosed in one stifle. Operated on. Still lame. Steroids injected. Still lame. After box rest for 9 months, a very angry and sad horse was injected with arthramid and is now "sound" in that leg. Sound, or can't feel the pain?
Same horse then started reacting to saddling. Back xrayed and kissing spine identified. Patched up with steroids and mesotherapy.
Now lame on a foreleg. Vet didn't bother xraying as horse "looks ok" and has recommended remedial farriery.
Owner still has intentions to jump as big as they can, dressage etc.
Now, to me, this is bordering on unethical. Horse hasn't seen a blade of grass in nearly a year. Is so young and to my understanding things like Chondromalacia are likely to be present in both stifles. It just seems like constant patching up and numbing of pain so she can be jumped and competed. I feel like the vets in particular aren't looking at the whole picture.
Just a musing really, but where does "treatment" border on unethical?
I'm all for making horses comfortable and not in pain, but where does this cross the line into unethical treatment? I suspect there is no easy answer.
I know of a 6yo horse. Chondromalacia diagnosed in one stifle. Operated on. Still lame. Steroids injected. Still lame. After box rest for 9 months, a very angry and sad horse was injected with arthramid and is now "sound" in that leg. Sound, or can't feel the pain?
Same horse then started reacting to saddling. Back xrayed and kissing spine identified. Patched up with steroids and mesotherapy.
Now lame on a foreleg. Vet didn't bother xraying as horse "looks ok" and has recommended remedial farriery.
Owner still has intentions to jump as big as they can, dressage etc.
Now, to me, this is bordering on unethical. Horse hasn't seen a blade of grass in nearly a year. Is so young and to my understanding things like Chondromalacia are likely to be present in both stifles. It just seems like constant patching up and numbing of pain so she can be jumped and competed. I feel like the vets in particular aren't looking at the whole picture.
Just a musing really, but where does "treatment" border on unethical?