can someone please help me if you wanted to see how good an event horse was when you look at his dressage what score would you count :
as good ??
or as bad ??
Also depends on when it last competed. Dressage penalty scoring changed (I think in 2002, some please correct). Prior to this date the dressage penalties were 3/5ths of score not gained so 25 would be good where 30 would be average.
20's (80%-71%) excellent
30's (70-61%)above average.
40's (60-51%) average, some good work shown, more to work on.
50's 50-41%) Below average, go practise!!
I would also consider looking at the whole section the horse was ridden in. As the judge could have been marking high or low consistently throughout.
I got a great score on a horse who would score early 40's but they gave me a 34 - the thing was the whole section was marked early 20s to late 30's dont think one was marked in the 40s!
They are from an awful long time ago- mind you if look at one of our horses BE scores it would one or two would look naff- 1 elimination in the dressage(rider took whip in- duh!!) and 1 in the SJ as the horse over jumped, rider came off, as did the stirrups, rider took so long getting stirrup back on they exceeded the time allowed!!!
If it is a horse you are thinking of buying - I wouldn't worry about the scores as the horse must be ancient now as it hasn't done a dressage test in 12 years, not really relevant to what it can do today
If itas for breeding I'd be far, far more interested in how bold it is xc and careful it is sj. Dressage is so dependant on training/riding so as long as it moves with some degree of balance and freedom, anything else on top is a bonus!!