Poppys Nannan
Well-Known Member
As in title - which do you prefer and why if possible
Hi love the fast fibre - used last winter as hay replacer and it cost way less then the nearly £6 a bale for hay did half amd half. Both my horses love it and i do use warm water in the really cold spells. Fab stuff wouldn't go back to beet again.
Eh Fast Fibre is £10ish a bag here!! So def not cheaper than hay!!!
Hi, between my two ponies lasted nearly 2 weeks and only used 4 bales of hay so overall it came out cheaper for the winter months when they were only out 4 hours a day (bout £4 a month) and that's an extra lesson. Both mine are very very good doers so nets are tripled and suspended from the ceiling.
Why are you all talking about ''bulking'' out feeds so they feel they are getting a ''proper meal'' ?!?
I still don't really see how that shows that Fast Fibre works out cheaper than hay? Unless you are buying it much cheaper than the rest of us!
Hi so without fast fibre i would spend at least £36 for 6 hay a week for 2 ponies
fast fibre £10 a bag lasts 2 weeks and only 4 hay so
£24 for 4 bales and £5 for half bag of fast fibre = £29
So a saving of £6 a week
But half a bag of Fast Fibre isn't anywhere near the equivalent feed value of two bales of hay!
Fast Fibre comes in 20kg bags and has a calorie content of 8 MJDE/kg. Small hay bales weigh between 20 and 25kg and average hay usually also has a calorie content of 8 MJDE/kg. So for a like for like swap you need to feed at least one bag of Fast Fibre to replace one bale of hay. So at £10 for a bag of Fast Fibre and £6 for a bale of hay, the hay is obviously much cheaper!