hihosilver
Well-Known Member
Hope its true there is a post on FB saying the little foal that was tied up with the bit in its mouth has been rescued along with other animals. The RSPCA have rescued him and he is safe.
Hope its true there is a post on FB saying the little foal that was tied up with the bit in its mouth has been rescued along with other animals. The RSPCA have rescued him and he is safe.
I read an update that said he was dead? The problem is FB is so unreliable as a source of info.
Hope its true there is a post on FB saying the little foal that was tied up with the bit in its mouth has been rescued along with other animals. The RSPCA have rescued him and he is safe.
Yes, animal rescue groups are often too intimidated to 'act' when Travellers are the owners and IME it's due the fact that most charity members/officers are female visiting alone on a case, 9.9 out of 10 times surrounded and outnumbered by male Travellers who again 9.9 times out of 10 personally threaten charity workers while holding items such as crow bars, hammers, chains and even knives.
It's not particularly pleasant I can tell you.
During the time I worked with a Vet practice, quite a number of seizures were carried out. 100% of the animals seized were owned by Travellers. Usually, we'd get a call from a charity asking US to go and investigate any animal welfare concerns initially. We held more clout you see, harder to tell a VET they are wrong but easy to cower a charity worker by telling them they don't know what they're talking about.
At the visit the Vet would decide what to do. Often the Vet would be able to talk to the owner and discuss the issues, if the horse was indeed ill but not 'on the verge of death', a treatment plan was offered, meds were supplied and the bill was settled in cash there and then, always on the condition that a follow up visit would happen within the appropriate timeframe to ensure the horse was improving.
In the cases where the horse wasn't improving, options were they could take it to the practice for more intense treatment and care. If they refused, we'd call Police, charity to come with transport and we'd then go back and seize. Same thing happened if on the 1st visit the horse(s) were too ill to wait, they would be seized that day.
The amount of times we were severely threatened are too numerous to count. Once we were even told 'they'd never find our bodies'. We still took their horses but we were always very glad when we got the job done and drove off!
Luckily neither the Vet or I are easily intimidated and as bizarre as this sounds the fact that I'm Irish seemed to have influence. The more they heard my accent the less aggressive they became, it was so odd. We also found the severity of the horse(s) injury/illness/neglect was directly proportionate to the hostility we were met with.
This is EXACTLY why the UK needs USA style animal welfare that is attached to law enforcement, get rid of the ridiculous RSPCA with no powers that splashes money on fatcat executives and will only act to make them look good and bring in hard line sherrifs with powers to immeditely remove suffering animals and arrest those responsible for cruelty and neglect, wallop up the price of alchohol and tobbacco to pay for it too!!!
This is EXACTLY why the UK needs USA style animal welfare that is attached to law enforcement, get rid of the ridiculous RSPCA with no powers that splashes money on fatcat executives and will only act to make them look good and bring in hard line sherrifs with powers to immeditely remove suffering animals and arrest those responsible for cruelty and neglect, wallop up the price of alchohol and tobbacco to pay for it too!!!
Try walking a day in an RSPCA officers boots and then say they are useless. How do you think the officers on the ground who work tirelessly and often many many hours overtime to try and help animals, feel when people endlessly slag them off? If you are 100% sure that every single RSPCA officer and employee are 'ridiculous' and 'useless' then fire away, but otherwise, perhaps spend a second to re-phrase what you type and make it a little less critical all round.
Bit harsh, I understand why you were but I don't think maisie06 has a problem with the 'foot soldiers' particularly, rather the 'fat cats' governing the RSPCA and their priorities.
No, Maisie06 said that the RSPCA only act to make themselves look good, which basically would imply the 'foot soldiers' as you refer them to do so too. If it were the case that the 'foot soldiers' felt that higher management acted unlawfully and were 'ridiculous', do you seriously believe they would continue to work for them? And many many officers have been in for decades if not their entire career. I get really angry when I continuously read sweeping statements tarring every single RSPCA associate with the same brush. It's the same as those who slag the NHS off. They can do nothing but spread negativity and hatred without having a sensible balanced viewpoint and realising the bigger picture.
I appreciate you feel very strongly about this subject. The 'Politics' you raise are very valid and worth discussion.
I don't do 'politics' Illusion100. It's very interesting that you used that word. It seems that any supporter of the RSPCA gets the word politics tagged onto them immediately. I hate politics. Can't be arsed with it. Never voted. Don't get involved. I just hate the fact that hard working people get slagged off to the hills without people taking a sensible, balanced and fully informed (which believe me, the majority of these anti RSPCA posts are really way out fact wise) approach. But then that's social media and ignorant people.
This is EXACTLY why the UK needs USA style animal welfare that is attached to law enforcement, get rid of the ridiculous RSPCA with no powers that splashes money on fatcat executives and will only act to make them look good and bring in hard line sherrifs with powers to immeditely remove suffering animals and arrest those responsible for cruelty and neglect, wallop up the price of alchohol and tobbacco to pay for it too!!!
No, Maisie06 said that the RSPCA only act to make themselves look good, which basically would imply the 'foot soldiers' as you refer them to do so too. If it were the case that the 'foot soldiers' felt that higher management acted unlawfully and were 'ridiculous', do you seriously believe they would continue to work for them? And many many officers have been in for decades if not their entire career. I get really angry when I continuously read sweeping statements tarring every single RSPCA associate with the same brush. It's the same as those who slag the NHS off. They can do nothing but spread negativity and hatred without having a sensible balanced viewpoint and realising the bigger picture.
Try walking a day in an RSPCA officers boots and then say they are useless. How do you think the officers on the ground who work tirelessly and often many many hours overtime to try and help animals, feel when people endlessly slag them off? If you are 100% sure that every single RSPCA officer and employee are 'ridiculous' and 'useless' then fire away, but otherwise, perhaps spend a second to re-phrase what you type and make it a little less critical all round.
No, Maisie06 said that the RSPCA only act to make themselves look good, which basically would imply the 'foot soldiers' as you refer them to do so too. If it were the case that the 'foot soldiers' felt that higher management acted unlawfully and were 'ridiculous', do you seriously believe they would continue to work for them? And many many officers have been in for decades if not their entire career. I get really angry when I continuously read sweeping statements tarring every single RSPCA associate with the same brush. It's the same as those who slag the NHS off. They can do nothing but spread negativity and hatred without having a sensible balanced viewpoint and realising the bigger picture.
They are ruddy useless IMHO....an RSPCA inspector messed up a big cruelty case in our local area in a big way and the owners got off scott free because this idiot was inept at the job....not to mention other animals left in dangerous situations and the RSPCA will only act once a decent welfare organisation is involved, I still say get rid of this ridiculous charity as they have let so many animals down.
This is EXACTLY why the UK needs USA style animal welfare that is attached to law enforcement, get rid of the ridiculous RSPCA with no powers that splashes money on fatcat executives and will only act to make them look good and bring in hard line sherrifs with powers to immeditely remove suffering animals and arrest those responsible for cruelty and neglect, wallop up the price of alchohol and tobbacco to pay for it too!!!