Weezy
Well-Known Member
Would you hunt if it was cheaper? Would you hunt more if it was cheaper?
Just thinking out loud really - I would hunt weekly if the charge to me was, say £25, but I cannot afford £60, I cannot afford to buy 8 tickets (OH would freak), so I will hunt less than I would like to.
Would it not be more sensible for hunts to take what they are offered and up their supporters rather than have less followers as people cannot afford it? I am pretty sure that those who can afford full subscription charges would continue to pay, but reduced subs for those who cannot afford to pay for full wouldn't be a bad idea - or do you think it would breed animosity? I would be happy to gate shut every other time I went out for instance, to pay my way...
If I was given full weekday membership, for the season, for, say £500 then I would be a very happy bunny - I don't feel it fair to pay for Saturdays when I never attend.
Anyway, am rambling - thoughts?
Just thinking out loud really - I would hunt weekly if the charge to me was, say £25, but I cannot afford £60, I cannot afford to buy 8 tickets (OH would freak), so I will hunt less than I would like to.
Would it not be more sensible for hunts to take what they are offered and up their supporters rather than have less followers as people cannot afford it? I am pretty sure that those who can afford full subscription charges would continue to pay, but reduced subs for those who cannot afford to pay for full wouldn't be a bad idea - or do you think it would breed animosity? I would be happy to gate shut every other time I went out for instance, to pay my way...
If I was given full weekday membership, for the season, for, say £500 then I would be a very happy bunny - I don't feel it fair to pay for Saturdays when I never attend.
Anyway, am rambling - thoughts?