Cecile
Well-Known Member
Not that this matters one jot in the whole scheme of things but free range is temporarily not free range
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39110992
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39110992
We didn't eat the eggs for a coupleof days because we didn't want to eat eggs that had been 'made' in a battery cage.
Was surprised to hear on the radio that the cut off from classed as free range eggs when the hens are then kept indoors is three months. I would have thought that is a huge length of time myself.When I lived in Surrey we had hens and they had been rescued them from battery cages.We didn't eat the eggs for a coupleof days because we didn't want to eat eggs that had been 'made' in a battery cage.
Shows how much you know about chicken!!
good grief.
Sorry don't quite understand that remark.Eggs take 24 or 25 hours to form in a hen and up to an hour to lay.We had the hens the day they were pulled from the battery cage.Why would we want to eat eggs that were laid within that 24 hour period if we are against battery cageegg production? Please do share.
Think you need a new book maybe.
As you are so keen on insisting I am wrong a quick search has found me an abstract from The Poultry Club of Great Britain...
Egg Production
It takes different times for the egg to pass through the different areas of the oviduct the addition of the shell taking the longest time:
15 minutes in the infundibulum (fertilised here if cockerel available plus chalazae added)
3 hours in the magnum to add albumen (white of egg)
1.5 hours in the isthmus to add shell membrane
20 hours in the uterus/shell gland for shell deposition plus pigment
1 minute in the vagina which is extruded out past the vent to avoid the faeces
This total of 25 hours to lay an egg explains why hens do not lay every day as the hen will ovulate 30 minutes after laying and eventually it is dark when this should happen: she then misses producing an egg the next day.[I][/I]
http://www.poultryclub.org/eggs/egg-production/
Sorry don't quite understand that remark.Eggs take 24 or 25 hours to form in a hen and up to an hour to lay.We had the hens the day they were pulled from the battery cage.Why would we want to eat eggs that were laid within that 24 hour period if we are against battery cageegg production? Please do share.
so its ok to waste the eggs the poor little hens managed to lay under such awful conditions then? why is wasting them acceptable? and how much did you pay for the 'rescue' hens out of interest?
What that neglects to tell you is the yolks are formed for many days prior to that . The sequence there just refers to to shell formation and im not sure about you but I avoid eating the shell if I can! so you have eaten eggs formed in cages lol. So sure of yourself arent you a little knowledge is a bad thing .
Talk about splitting hairs.
I didn't say the eggs were wasted, my parents had them.We had a dozen hens.This was about eight or nine years ago when we lived in surrey.We paid five pounds for the hens the BHWT who I volunteered for usually asked for a donation of a couple of pounds per bird of adopters.It was about 25 miles from home so I only volunteered occassionaly but it was good fun and I enjoyed it.so its ok to waste the eggs the poor little hens managed to lay under such awful conditions then? why is wasting them acceptable? and how much did you pay for the 'rescue' hens out of interest?
Not sure where they would have got hens pulled from battery cages in the uk, they were outlawed in 2011 perhaps they missed that out of the leaflets as well.
the whole sanctimonious 'rescuing commercial hens' thing is beyond me (fine to do it, don't preach about it with incorrect info). why are these people not out rescuing cattle going for slaughter-and paying for them.
The eggs haven't been free range for three months although have continued to be sold as such. Didn't everyone say that the EU would preserve their status?.. Apparently not.
Partly I suspect because it would have been a labelling nightmare, not just for the eggs but all the products containing them that purport to contain free range eggs.
Australia also seems to have a thing about free range eggs
maybe so, but the drive for barn/free range has been UK led in Europe-according to one of the biggest manufacturers of commercial poultry housing in Europe.
I've not bought a shop egg or chicken in some years-I grow my own. I do however, now work on the fringes of the industry. I see as many (not better/worse-just different) welfare concerns in backyard flocks as I do the commercial ones tbh. too many people eat free range eggs but happy to eat broiler chicken, its a strange argument.
Why such contempt for my comments then please?I think of all users MoC is one of the least likely to laugh at the concept of hens having feelings or naming them, given her username and all .
.
the whole sanctimonious 'rescuing commercial hens' thing is beyond me (fine to do it, don't preach about it with incorrect info). why are these people not out rescuing cattle going for slaughter-and paying for them.
You really can't understand the difference between having chickens vs. having cattle? What a daft question.
well of course I can. Theoretically/ethically the argument is the same though-unless people are vegan.I dont see people's outrage about sheep/cattle that have outlived their usefulness going to slaughter.
These hens are not rescues, they are not being rescued from a horrible life, they are merely stopped from going to slaughter. We have the argument on this forum all the time about rescue horses, meat men and well meaning people buying from them. I dont care if people do or dont buy ex batt hens, but they aren't acting against the industry they proclaim to despise so I find the holier than thou attitude a bit difficult to understand tbh.