It's very hard to get away with drugging in this country due to the routine drugs testing at the races. All well beaten favourites are tested, all bigger priced winners or places are tested, and most winners are tested regardless.
So, with such monitoring, and then reading from the quote from the BHA (below), was it a simple case of arrogance or are illegal drugs used during training, with the hope that the residues are gone by the time that race day arrives? To deny an understanding of the rules, is adding insult to injury.
"A BHA statement revealed that a total of 11 horses including Certify have been suspended from running as the result of a 'testing in training' sampling programme conducted. A total of 45 horses were tested on April 9 during a random visit that the BHA said arose from two positive tests on Al Zarooni horses in the previous 12 months".
Two positive tests, from one yard in the last 12 months? Would the quickest route for the message to get through, not have been that the BHA take action after the first positive test?
How TF does this system work? Two strikes and your out? Perhaps someone should point out to the BHA, the JC and any other party with authority, that this isn't a game of rounders.
Phipps was right, the JC are spineless, as are the BHA it seems.
I wonder if Zarooni's signed on yet, it wouldn't surprise me.
Alec.