windand rain
Well-Known Member
Can someone clear my mind about something I have been confused about for a very long time. Is dry weight hay unsoaked better for fat/ laminitic horses than grass which has a high water content so is more filling. Just having trouble getting my head round why one would feed 11 kgs of unsoaked hay to a horse rather than letting it graze naturally on long grass/resticted grass. It is probably a very simple answer but it does confuse me a bit. I appreciate grass is sugary while growing but if they are eating less volume while trickle feeding it should really be a matter of the grass being better than hay why isnt it. This is an observation made from many sources where people perceive feeding dry hay in a limited movement environment as better than allowing grazing where the horse has to find the herbage so is required to move more.I do know that many people soak hay but again the concept of soaking for hours and not washing off is a bit odd to me as surely the water is syrup. My acute laminitic pony lives out on a grass track 24/7 365 the movement is what keeps him sound the grass is bowling green length he hasnt had an attack since we started him on the track he has no hay and a small feed daily he is slim and happier than he ever was while on very restricted grazing and in and out on soaked hay. His laminitis blips were due to him being let out of his pen by well wishers now they see him as being like any other horse so leave him alone He lives with 2 others and is not ridden