Rainbowmoon
New User
I loaned a horse for just over 2 months. It was fraught with problems from the day it arrived. The owner drew up a BHS loan contract, but never visted my yard. I had the horse collected by a transporter but not directly from the owner. It was at her friends yard who had been borrowing him for a few months. On arrival the horse was underweight and covered in field scars which I photographed along with all the tack supplied. We spent weeks trying to feed the horse up, had the teeth rasped, wormed, but it never settled. My son was riding it but it was never happy. I had an instructor look at them riding and she told me the saddle didn't fit and the horse had a back problem which was later confirmed by a chiropractor at my expense. From this point on my son did not ride the horse, until after the treatment and convalesence time. We bought a saddle professionally fitted, she told me the saddle supplied was the worst fitting saddle she had ever seen. But the horse was still not happy at being ridden. All this time I kept the owner informed but she told me the horse was taking the mickey put of my son and would hack out and ride in the school. She told me the saddle did fit and it needed a narrower gullet. She offered to send her sister down to ride the horse to prove he would work. Eventually, I admitted defeat and asked to send the horse back.
The owner is now complaining the horse has a very sore back and wants to claim treatment from me.
Can anyone tell me if this is correct please?
The owner is now complaining the horse has a very sore back and wants to claim treatment from me.
Can anyone tell me if this is correct please?