Enfys
Well-Known Member
OK, bit of a debate going on here this morning.
The debate is...
Horses should not chew wood at all, ever, and if they do they should be fenced off to prevent it, or wear a collar?
versus
If there are no (sacrificial) trees for them to nibble on then it does them no harm to be provided with a suitable pole/log/branch.
We are talking about wood chewing as opposed to cribbing/windsucking. The reason for the chewing is irrelevant, it is the "should they, or shouldn't they?" question I am interested in.
So, should horses be permitted to fulfill a natural action or should they be prevented from doing so?
The debate is...
Horses should not chew wood at all, ever, and if they do they should be fenced off to prevent it, or wear a collar?
versus
If there are no (sacrificial) trees for them to nibble on then it does them no harm to be provided with a suitable pole/log/branch.
We are talking about wood chewing as opposed to cribbing/windsucking. The reason for the chewing is irrelevant, it is the "should they, or shouldn't they?" question I am interested in.
So, should horses be permitted to fulfill a natural action or should they be prevented from doing so?