johnson
New User
On a subject I know None of us Like to think about. I thought I would warn other forum users about Insurance companies and Their thoughts on what Humane Destruction means. It does not mean that when an owner and a vet agree that the best thing for a horse is to be put down. I Had My horse put down three weeks ago after he had badly damaged a tendon in his Hock. The Vet and I had done everything in our power to make it better and after 7 months of treatment, we both decided not to put him though any more. He was never going to come right and wasn't suitable to be retired( which is what the Insurance company thought should happen even though they had never met the horse in question), partly through his temperament, his size (he was a 16.1hh (looked like he had percheron blood in him)heavy weight cob)and the fact that the hard ground in the summer would not agree with his damaged hock.They decided that I have not got a case for claiming on lose of horse and therefore will not pay for his having been put down either. What Mattered to me was my horse and not causing him any more suffering if thats not humane then what is !!!( I have deliberately not named the insurance company as I have other animals insured with them(but probably not for much longer but as I have paid this years premium will not be changing till renewal time). My Vet has been brilliant though all this and even wrote them a letter explaining why we had taken the course of action we had but the insurance think they know best!
--------------------
--------------------