I don't want to cause a riot but....

I

imyourstalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 March 2008
Messages
1,410
Location
Horsham, West Sussex
www.myspace.com
this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnUOrIVWByI
made me very angry. The hunters wouldn't be as angry and pi**ed off if people like the protesters would leave them alone! Its because they drive them to be angry and swear and whatever! Ok ok, so some of the things they say and rude and they should do or say the things some of them do but I think I would act exactly like that if I was them!

THIS IS NOT ABOUT WHO IS FOR OR AGAINST FOX HUNTING, ITS JUST ABOUT THE VIDEO! I DONT WANT ANY ARGUMENTS PLEASE!

!!!!!!!!!!VIDEO CONTAINS SWEARING!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I think it's disgraceful when people can't hold a valid argument/debate without swearing.

I can swear with the best of them (usually when Neddy is being an ar*e over nothing) but is there really any need for verbal/physical abuse to get your point across?? I don't think so!
 
If the bloo*y anti's left there would be no swearing. God they drive me mad. Why can't they just go and live in their town and stay away. The language is to much though.
 
Its just all provocation isn't it..... The antis put up videos like this all the time. The other side of the coin is rarely shown. Terrible language though.
My sympathies are with the poor horses that have to put up with all this... bet they'd rather be munching hay at home !!!
 
Wow.....I'm glad it is nice round here!!

I have only had one person (standing outside her house) say anything in my earshot....other than that people wave and smile!

Perhaps it is cos there arent any foxes round here???.....the only ones I have seen have been going the opposite way to the hounds!!
 
I've always thought that those who cannot get their point across without resorting to swearing have a very poor grasp of the English language


Says the woman who can swear like a trooper
blush.gif
tongue.gif
 
With careful editing i could appear to be intelligent, witty with a good word to say about everybody! but hey, we all know they're only going to show one side of the story.
 
I don't hunt but I'm not against it, however, if while out on my horse I came across a person with a video in my face and they wouldn't move I know I would quickly resort to both verbal then physical abuse. These people by law have the right to meet and ride out on their horses with dogs and people on foot, it's supposed to be a free counrty. When sabs impede their legal right it's going to cause friction, the police don't monitor the sabs and therefore people take the law into their own hands.
I'm so impressed I managed to not make this about being pro or anti, go me!
 
I've always thought that those who cannot get their point across without resorting to swearing have a very poor grasp of the English language

One of the reasons i can't stand Gordon Ramsey!
grin.gif
 
If you lose your cool and resort to verbal abuse, you've lost the argument, no matter what the provocation.

And if your average teenage lad spoke to a policeman the way that huntsman did (along with the rather aggressive whip pointing) they would be arrested and banged up before they could think of a swear word!
 
[ QUOTE ]


And if your average teenage lad spoke to a policeman the way that huntsman did (along with the rather aggressive whip pointing) they would be arrested and banged up before they could think of a swear word!

[/ QUOTE ]

But the sabs are not the police. I've cut this short as it's not suppposed to be pro or anti, the behaviour in that video is aggressive but imo completely justified. If a member of the public tried to deny me my right to ride a horse as I choose to I would not spend much time debating the point, i'd ride right over the top of them!
 
What a farce! WHAT rights do trespassers have to barge onto private land??? I totally see their point in some respects but they got what they wanted so why are they STILL antagonising??
 
Because it is about a perceived class war, nothing to do with animal welfare, for the most part. The perception of a lot of sabs is that people who hunt are rich, therefore they are bad and that land should belong to all (not sure about the freehold of their own houses though)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


And if your average teenage lad spoke to a policeman the way that huntsman did (along with the rather aggressive whip pointing) they would be arrested and banged up before they could think of a swear word!

[/ QUOTE ]

But the sabs are not the police. I've cut this short as it's not suppposed to be pro or anti, the behaviour in that video is aggressive but imo completely justified. If a member of the public tried to deny me my right to ride a horse as I choose to I would not spend much time debating the point, i'd ride right over the top of them!

[/ QUOTE ]

My point referred to huntsman shouting at a copper who warns him and others to move on. And I stick to my original point that using such aggressive language does not help you win the argument. In fact I think it brings you down to the offender's level.
 
I'm not watching all of it, I have heard much about C&H sabs from being with the hunt next door.

Hell, if they're particularly bored they come our way as well.

They are well known for setting up situations to film and will aggrovate hunters into reaction.

One film of the C&H huntsman hitting a female sab "forgot" to include the part where she'd sprayed him in the face with an unknown substance.

Scum. Anyone who has to set up situations in order to claim anyone is normally like that deserves to be shot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top