R2R
Well-Known Member
My 'thing' is bringing horses on. I enjoy breaking, re-breaking and schooling young and problem horses. I believe I do it well, my horses are happy, contented etc.
The highest level I have competed for the past two years is all unaffiliated levels (to open) and BD Prelim and BSJA British novice. I do an awful lot of hacking too.
Prior to this I had a very good horse who I sold on who was schooling 1.30's and jumping consistent double clears at newcomers/foxhunters.
There seems to be an ingrained 'thing' in this country that in order to be a good rider, you have to compete. I dont think this is true. I get more satisfaction from my four year old jumping his first course than I ever did going clear at foxhunter level.
I wonder how many people have the ability, but choose to put it elsewhere? And why do people judge you by what level you compete at? Am I less of a rider because I ride prelims?
The highest level I have competed for the past two years is all unaffiliated levels (to open) and BD Prelim and BSJA British novice. I do an awful lot of hacking too.
Prior to this I had a very good horse who I sold on who was schooling 1.30's and jumping consistent double clears at newcomers/foxhunters.
There seems to be an ingrained 'thing' in this country that in order to be a good rider, you have to compete. I dont think this is true. I get more satisfaction from my four year old jumping his first course than I ever did going clear at foxhunter level.
I wonder how many people have the ability, but choose to put it elsewhere? And why do people judge you by what level you compete at? Am I less of a rider because I ride prelims?