twisteddiamond
Well-Known Member
as post title really?
The chap was driving along the bridle way and shooting out of his car window
The chap was driving along the bridle way and shooting out of his car window
I thought it was legal to shoot from a bridleway as long as you do not shoot over it.
Spot on Kitemano .it depends who owns the land.
if the bridleway is on private land and the shooter has the shooting rights on the land that the path goes over he has full rights to shoot on it over it and beside it.
if he was using a air rifle or a shot gun he wont have many problems shooting there but if he was using a rifle the land would have to be cleared with the police and they would definetly have put restrictions with regards the bridle path.
on our land that we shoot we are only allowed to shoot away from public paths but thats with a rifle. i dont think theres any restrictions when it comes to air rifles and shotguns.
if it's a problem, i would have a word because anyone who shoots needs to have commonsense.![]()
Sorry Mike but I don't think that's true.
I had someone shooting on a footpath that runs adjacent to my field a few weeks ago. I rang the police as, although he wasn't shooting 'at' my horses I was concerned he might hit them by accident.
The police told me it was totally illegal for him to be shooting there, and to dial 999 if it ever happened again.
I can't imagine it would be any different for a bridleway which is, after all, a public right of way.
It would be a common law nuisance,wilful obstruction of the highway,breach of the Health and Safety at work Act or intimidation. If it was a byeway open to all traffic it would be an offence to discharge a firearm with in 50 feet of the center and this would include air rifles. See the Blue Book
Sorry, but you are wrong.
Mike, Kiteman, and Alec are absolutely correct in regards this, and the law as well as the lack of basic knowledge of such matters demonstrated by your average police officer.
Are you saying that Rights of Way a guide to law and practice by Riddall and Trevelyan is wrong as my quote is from the Blue book
A bridleway is a right of way for horses over land which belongs to someone.Often ownership is by the local authority but frequently not. The land owner retains the right to use his land,regardless of it being a bridlepath. So if he chooses to drive on it or gives authority to do so ,he is completely entitled,because it is his land.Shooting would also not be restricted. The law only refers to shooting within a certain distance of the highway.Without more specific details it is not clear whether an offence has been commited. I could well envisage a game keeper potting vermin from a landrover for example.It simply boils down to ,"did this person have authority to shoot on this land".
It's illegal to shoot from a moving vehicle or one with the engine on.
Are you saying that Rights of Way a guide to law and practice by Riddall and Trevelyan is wrong as my quote is from the Blue book