silu
Well-Known Member
I was looking at the breeding of the runners in this years Derby and saw that 1/2 the field including those finishing 1st 3rd and 4th were all by Galileo or in 1 case the dam was.
I know very little about breeding but was wondering if such dominance is good for the future of Thoroughbreds. I know Sadlers Wells was similarly very dominent in the past and whether this has been a good thing I wouldn't know. Montjeu again has been used extensively and I think I'm right in saying his temperament left a lot to be desired and that was passed on to plenty of his offspring?
I know a fair bit about breeding dogs and it can be very bad for a particular breed if 1 dog is overused for breeding. A breed of dog had it's previous sound temperament badly damaged by a winner of Crufts many many years. To this day the breed still isn't quite what it used to be.
I'd be very interested in the opinions of those who know about the "blue riband" end of Thoroughbred breeding.
I know very little about breeding but was wondering if such dominance is good for the future of Thoroughbreds. I know Sadlers Wells was similarly very dominent in the past and whether this has been a good thing I wouldn't know. Montjeu again has been used extensively and I think I'm right in saying his temperament left a lot to be desired and that was passed on to plenty of his offspring?
I know a fair bit about breeding dogs and it can be very bad for a particular breed if 1 dog is overused for breeding. A breed of dog had it's previous sound temperament badly damaged by a winner of Crufts many many years. To this day the breed still isn't quite what it used to be.
I'd be very interested in the opinions of those who know about the "blue riband" end of Thoroughbred breeding.