cruiseline
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Whilst i agree to a point, wasn't it the selectors that chose Ben? If you had asked him 6 months if the horse was ready for the Olympics he would have said no, but the selectors made a bold choice after the horse went to the USA and made the step up. I would also like to hear what the team vets say because they have a big say as to whether a horse is fit to travel or not.
I don't think it is just about the riders young or old, it is about the horses and more importantly about the shows in the UK. A horse will learn far more 2 weeks abroad then they will 6 months in the UK but there are limited places and unfortunatly the fact is there are a lot of 'older' riders with a stable yard of good horses. We dumb down our classes in the UK from young horses upwards and I think the standard has got to be raised to get the horses jumping and so that 'young riders' can prove they are up to the mantle. I know it is a waste of money putting horses in 1.40m GP's at shows but there is nothing else. a GP should be 1.50m and I bet the standard of jumping of both horse and rider will significantly improve.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree in part!!! The UK shows have a lot to answer to, but that goes for the BSJA also. For example, most of the big (bigger) classes are held at the county shows, where there is no guarantee regarding the ground, you take your horse future in your hands if you want to compete in knee deep mud or rock hard concrete, especially with the summers we are having at the moment. It is about time that the BSJA made sure that big competitions are being held in venues that can look after the welfare of our horses, be them top or up and coming.
It was the selectors that chose Ben, and to be honest, that was the only decent choice they have made this millennium. If they had stuck their necks out a few year ago and sent more of the younger riders to Nations Cups and Internationals, then they might have had a bigger pool to choose from.
Lets hope they have learnt their lesson before 2012.
Whilst i agree to a point, wasn't it the selectors that chose Ben? If you had asked him 6 months if the horse was ready for the Olympics he would have said no, but the selectors made a bold choice after the horse went to the USA and made the step up. I would also like to hear what the team vets say because they have a big say as to whether a horse is fit to travel or not.
I don't think it is just about the riders young or old, it is about the horses and more importantly about the shows in the UK. A horse will learn far more 2 weeks abroad then they will 6 months in the UK but there are limited places and unfortunatly the fact is there are a lot of 'older' riders with a stable yard of good horses. We dumb down our classes in the UK from young horses upwards and I think the standard has got to be raised to get the horses jumping and so that 'young riders' can prove they are up to the mantle. I know it is a waste of money putting horses in 1.40m GP's at shows but there is nothing else. a GP should be 1.50m and I bet the standard of jumping of both horse and rider will significantly improve.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree in part!!! The UK shows have a lot to answer to, but that goes for the BSJA also. For example, most of the big (bigger) classes are held at the county shows, where there is no guarantee regarding the ground, you take your horse future in your hands if you want to compete in knee deep mud or rock hard concrete, especially with the summers we are having at the moment. It is about time that the BSJA made sure that big competitions are being held in venues that can look after the welfare of our horses, be them top or up and coming.
It was the selectors that chose Ben, and to be honest, that was the only decent choice they have made this millennium. If they had stuck their necks out a few year ago and sent more of the younger riders to Nations Cups and Internationals, then they might have had a bigger pool to choose from.
Lets hope they have learnt their lesson before 2012.