Having skim read it I wondered if having waterfowl made it more of a problem, am I right in thinking you just have to keep them away from your chooks?
A friend has shared on FB that a wetland place in NW England has now got it. It is beyond me how they have been allowed to stay open, I assume it is the RSPB pound giving them extra powers.
I read it as having to keep wild waterfowl away from my birds. I can manage the chickens being in a small area-the ducks (mucky blighters) not so much. I want to move them out to a larger netted area as soon as I'm allowed. They seem alright but aren't laying yet-they usually start in January.
There was an RSPB place with it down south I think, still open.
Hooray, mine will be so pleased, although I think they have got used to it now. We do have geese stopping off for a graze, not sure how I can keep them separate from where the geese land, although I daresay the geese don't some near the yard and the hens don't wander that far.
As I read the regs you will still need to enclose the hens within a fenced area they cannot go completely free range.
agreed-if they are outside they should be in netted runs-use bird netting and/or rubble netting-both are quite cheap.
I read it as having to keep wild waterfowl away from my birds. …….. .
By 'away from' does that mean that you have to also stop waterfowl from flying overhead and crapping on your birds?
I often wonder if those who dream up these knee-jerk reactions actually think first! Do we remember the site in Lincolnshire where there was an outbreak? It was a Bernard Matthews turkey farm and those birds barely see the light of day, never mind having access to wild birds!
Alec.
By 'away from' does that mean that you have to also stop waterfowl from flying overhead and crapping on your birds?
Alec.
This map will give you a more accurate indication of which zone your in, it is interactive.
http://www.gisdiseasemap.defra.gov.uk/intmaps/avian/map.jsp
Im guessing a few on here may be effected by the latest outbreak in 23k birds at Redgrave in suffolk.
Interesting that yet again, it's a housed flock, broiler birds to be precise and they will unlikely have seen the light of day, far less had the opportunity to become infected by the 'believed' air-borne route. Is there any thinking from DEFRA's experts as to just how it's the large indoor flocks which are being struck down rather than, as we'd imagine, those birds which live outside?
It's also curious, to me anyway, that within these housed flocks the number of birds which are succumbing to the disease which presumably will have alerted the staff to a problem. There will probably be a natural loss of 5-10% under normal circumstances, so we can only imagine that there have been a considerable number of deaths from the disease itself. The remainder of a flock will obviously be killed as a precautionary measure.
I remain of the opinion that DEFRA are just as much in the dark as is everyone else.
Alec.
Interesting that yet again, it's a housed flock, broiler birds to be precise and they will unlikely have seen the light of day, far less had the opportunity to become infected by the 'believed' air-borne route. Is there any thinking from DEFRA's experts as to just how it's the large indoor flocks which are being struck down rather than, as we'd imagine, those birds which live outside?
It's also curious, to me anyway, that within these housed flocks the number of birds which are succumbing to the disease which presumably will have alerted the staff to a problem. There will probably be a natural loss of 5-10% under normal circumstances, so we can only imagine that there have been a considerable number of deaths from the disease itself. The remainder of a flock will obviously be killed as a precautionary measure.
I remain of the opinion that DEFRA are just as much in the dark as is everyone else.
Alec.
Alec, this is a strain of high pathogenicity avian flu-so yes, there will be a lot of birds fall ill and die in a short space of time in a susceptible population. .. .
I'm well aware of the potency of the disease, but still I haven't yet heard anyone explain how 'contained' birds seem to be the most susceptible, excepting for posdosh's thoughts that being contained may lower their own immunity and in that he may be right. As these contained (housed) birds have no access to wild birds, the question remains, and perhaps when it's answered, a way forward will be found as to why the disease finds it's way indoors.
It would seem that your experience and that of popsdosh, considering DEFRA are different to mine. Previously, DEFRA are given to knee-jerk reactions which has most watching them run around, like the proverbial headless chickens.
If you have a greater, or a different understanding than I do, can you explain why the only reported cases of avian bird-flue come from housed and intensely kept flocks which have no access to the supposed carriers, rather than the rustic and open air system by which you and I keep poultry and which almost certainly will and which to date, seem to be free of infection?
Alec.
Does anyone think that there is more bird flu about but it hasn't been reported. By this I mean people who have gone up to there allotment in the afternoon and found poorly birds and disposed of them not your big concerns.
If you have a greater, or a different understanding than I do, can you explain why the only reported cases of avian bird-flue come from housed and intensely kept flocks which have no access to the supposed carriers, rather than the rustic and open air system by which you and I keep poultry and which almost certainly will and which to date, seem to be free of infection?
Alec.
I think you have been missing something Alec there have been many cases in poultry that have been running around even though they were meant to be inside nearly all small backyard flocks ,two cases in pheasants, many in wild bird carcases that have been tested including those at slimbridge. You even commented about the pheasant cases.