McCartney/Mills judgement

"Reasonable needs of £3,250,000 p.a."
shocked.gif

I wonder how we all manage to struggle by on the merest fraction (in my case - about half of 1%) of that?
 
Gosh - I can't think why she wanted that kept quiet. Oh - that's right, security reasons - nothing at all to do with her 'inconsistent, inaccurate and less than candid' evidence
smirk.gif
 
I already browsed this document with much interest.
Time and time and time again it relects on her lack of honesty, fabricated figures and total lack of evidence to back up her assertions. For a legal document to be so candid about her - well, that says it all.
crazy.gif

Bet Sir Paul will be breathing a VERY big sigh of relief now ----- Until she goes to the papers/digs out her 'manuscripts' that is?
confused.gif
frown.gif
Something tells me she has the perfect imagination to write fiction.
 
I had to turn radio one off yesterday as I just couldn't listen to another winging word come out of her mouth. I'm sure lots of children cope on a lot less than $35,000 a year. She really doesn't do herself any favours with the media who already think she is a gold digger.
 
I got part way through reading it and then realised I felt dirty, sort of sneakily in the way you would if you read someone's diary..
I gathered the judge found her less than truthful and judged accordingly.
I do find it slightly worrying that all their addresses were published for any nutter to go to (John Lennon scenario?)
I don't much like her but I do hope she uses the money wisely and to do some good, it would perhaps help the publics' view of her too.
Hopefully it will be tomorrow's fish and chip paper before long..
 
I think it will go one of two ways HH. She will either disappear into quiet obscurity or will be chat show fodder for months to come.

I hope this does give her a kick up the pants to be honest and that she does all she can learn to show much better behaviour in the future.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I got part way through reading it and then realised I felt dirty, sort of sneakily in the way you would if you read someone's diary..

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah HH - you're the conscions (sp) of us all. I must admit to having the fleeting thought last night that you wouldn't approve of me reading document. But I did, and found it really interesting. Not from the point of the celebrities involved, but in terms of the language used, and very thoughtful and insightfull way the judge summed up the case.

I particularly liked the way in which he was not prepared to call Heather fraudulent in her attempt to get her hands on some £400,000 to pay off an imaginary debt secured on one of her properties..............
 
[ QUOTE ]
I had to turn radio one off yesterday as I just couldn't listen to another winging word come out of her mouth. I'm sure lots of children cope on a lot less than $35,000 a year. She really doesn't do herself any favours with the media who already think she is a gold digger.

[/ QUOTE ]
Its £35 000 a year which is roughly $60 000..just thinking of what i could do for my family with that amount of money
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top