Hollyanna
Well-Known Member
My horse has been lame for a few weeks now, vet has her at 1 to 2 tenths lame. Initial nerve blocks narrowed it down to the feet (both front feet, although initially only appeared lame in one). We have just done a navicular bursa nerve block and this made her sound. We now believe its either inflammation of the navicular bursa or damage to the deep digital flexor tendon, both caused by poor conformation in the front feet (she has a very flat foot and little heel). The farrier has now put in heel wedges, which the vet says will help. Vet has recommended an MRI scan to eliminate the tendon issue. The x rays showed no changes in the navicular bone.
She has had the odd call out for lameness, none of which went over the insurance excess. One we believe was a trapped nerve and then another time slight lameness which the vet thought she had tweaked something messing around in the field, the vets treatment for both was a few danilon and a couple of days rest. She has been fine for quite some time but I am pretty sure the insurance company will try and wriggle out of paying so am dreading putting in my claim as the older ones were all well over a year ago. At the time the vet felt neither warranted further investigation. Now with this occurring do you think its likely they will quibble over the history? At the time if they thought i should have investigated i would have done this happily! The vets fees are at £900 already and the MRI will be circa £1100 plus livery and travel costs...... My vet has said if its the tendon that the prognosis is not good, up to year box rest and a high risk of reoccurrence. She is stressy and clingy and box walks, particularly when her friends are moved in and out of the barn so a year in the stable would not be good.... feeling a little angry that i didn't pursue it earlier but also just want to do whats best for the horse without leaving me in huge debt...
wondering what experiences ppl have had with this sort of thing both from the insurance perspective and the horses medical prognosis? If they won't pay for the MRI i wonder if I can continue on the assumption it is the inflammation and she should come sound with the heel wedges or cortisone injections? Any ideas welcome, i may be panicking for nothing?!
She has had the odd call out for lameness, none of which went over the insurance excess. One we believe was a trapped nerve and then another time slight lameness which the vet thought she had tweaked something messing around in the field, the vets treatment for both was a few danilon and a couple of days rest. She has been fine for quite some time but I am pretty sure the insurance company will try and wriggle out of paying so am dreading putting in my claim as the older ones were all well over a year ago. At the time the vet felt neither warranted further investigation. Now with this occurring do you think its likely they will quibble over the history? At the time if they thought i should have investigated i would have done this happily! The vets fees are at £900 already and the MRI will be circa £1100 plus livery and travel costs...... My vet has said if its the tendon that the prognosis is not good, up to year box rest and a high risk of reoccurrence. She is stressy and clingy and box walks, particularly when her friends are moved in and out of the barn so a year in the stable would not be good.... feeling a little angry that i didn't pursue it earlier but also just want to do whats best for the horse without leaving me in huge debt...
wondering what experiences ppl have had with this sort of thing both from the insurance perspective and the horses medical prognosis? If they won't pay for the MRI i wonder if I can continue on the assumption it is the inflammation and she should come sound with the heel wedges or cortisone injections? Any ideas welcome, i may be panicking for nothing?!