Opinions on this 2 year old please

[NicolaC]

Could I please have some opinions on this 2 year old.

Not the best piccies I'm afraid as she is rather friendly and wouldn't stand up properly.

 

[scotsmare]

Her hocks don't look right but not sure if it's pics or markings

I take it she's shire / clydie cross?

 

[LadyRascasse]

i don't like her back legs i don't know why but i don't something not right in my opinion

 

[Cliqmo]

Clydie x? She is a little straight through the stifle and hock but this might be dodgy photography and her age? In general I think she looks gorgeous

 

[Cobbysmum]

She looks a little tucked up, maybe to do with the cold and rain? But she looks to have a typical clyde back end. I always think a lot of white on legs sometimes gives a wrong impression. She's got a lot of developing to do - she looks a sweetie.

 

[NicolaC]

She has no clyde or shire in her at all!

Her Sire is Resident Gypsy ( Hackney x ID ) and her mum is a TB.

I think she is really nice but just wanted some opinions from other people.

 

[scotsmare]

PMSL well we got that spectacularly wrong

It's always difficult to pick a good two year old - I sometimes think it's better if they look wrong at that age as they will grow into a nice horse - a perfect looking two year old often means a horrible 4 yr old

 

[Cobbysmum]

Now I'm surprised, with that colouring I felt sure she would have some Clyde in her.

 

[Cliqmo]

[ QUOTE ]
She has no clyde or shire in her at all!

Her Sire is Resident Gypsy ( Hackney x ID ) and her mum is a TB.

I think she is really nice but just wanted some opinions from other people.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oops! My bad!

Still think she looks lovely and the ID would mean she still has lots of growing to do

 

[spotsmum]

I like her, I would have thuoght shire or clydie cross tho. Looks a really friendly girl with a huge personality!!!

 

[Tiffany]

I'm really surprised with her breeding cos I agree with others

I would have said Clyde X. Her back legs look quite weak but as she grows and gets stronger it should help

Looks a nice sort to me

 

[QUICKFIRE]

I can see how some people may mistake the breed with the leg markings, but just look at the legs no way clyde or shire, for a two yr old she is very well grown, although I suspect she wont finish until about 7 or 8 so as she is also croup high has a lot of growing to do, she looks a bit short in the back, but thats makes for a good jumper, I would say she looks a bit light through the shoulder ( on the last pic ) compared to the backend, overall for a 2y old looks quite a usefull sort, I like her.

 

[Rouletterose]

Agree with you, she looks cold and is therefore hunching up a bit, I think the colouring (white) on her back legs gives a bit of an optical illusion with regard to the hocks.

I think she looks good for a two year old and I like her lots.