ester
Not slacking multitasking
I just want to check that I am giving sensible advice here and wondered if any of you had any extra thoughts.
Pony purchased one week ago, ad described as 100% in every way. buyer asked if it reared.. told no.
Pony has been ridden by child's instructor and has proved very nappy, and reared when asked to go past the field gate on the way back from a hack. Seller has been contacted and has said that pony has previously reared when leading in from the field (some time ago/before she had it). New owner obviously not happy for daughter to now ride this pony (3k spent). They also cannot get near the pony in the field..it kicks.
Obviously we have all the usual pony not been in home very long, poss a bit young- 7 unsettled etc but I don't think a pony intended for a child should be rearing quite that easily, kid is competent but not that confident. However the previous owner could also be telling the truth and it hasn't reared with her (she is a 30 yo, although it has supposedly been pony clubbed so must also have been ridden by kids at some point)
New owner has contacted solicitor but has been told that because she signed a sold as seen piece of paper she might not be able to proceed, is this correct? Do they actually carry out that much weight?
Would owner contacting the BHS helpline be beneficial over and above her contacting her own solicitor?
I have suggested the following.
All future contact with seller to be by email/letter so there is a paper trail
get solicitor to write letter to say you want to send pony back as not as described and therefore flouting the sale of goods act to the seller.
Do some digging to try and find out if anyone else knows about this pony's rearing (or not) history, contact pony club DC etc (obv she should have done this previously).
Any other thoughts? I have said that the general consensus on here is that it is sometimes not worth the agro of taking it to court and that selling on is sometimes the better/easier/sensible option.
Pony purchased one week ago, ad described as 100% in every way. buyer asked if it reared.. told no.
Pony has been ridden by child's instructor and has proved very nappy, and reared when asked to go past the field gate on the way back from a hack. Seller has been contacted and has said that pony has previously reared when leading in from the field (some time ago/before she had it). New owner obviously not happy for daughter to now ride this pony (3k spent). They also cannot get near the pony in the field..it kicks.
Obviously we have all the usual pony not been in home very long, poss a bit young- 7 unsettled etc but I don't think a pony intended for a child should be rearing quite that easily, kid is competent but not that confident. However the previous owner could also be telling the truth and it hasn't reared with her (she is a 30 yo, although it has supposedly been pony clubbed so must also have been ridden by kids at some point)
New owner has contacted solicitor but has been told that because she signed a sold as seen piece of paper she might not be able to proceed, is this correct? Do they actually carry out that much weight?
Would owner contacting the BHS helpline be beneficial over and above her contacting her own solicitor?
I have suggested the following.
All future contact with seller to be by email/letter so there is a paper trail
get solicitor to write letter to say you want to send pony back as not as described and therefore flouting the sale of goods act to the seller.
Do some digging to try and find out if anyone else knows about this pony's rearing (or not) history, contact pony club DC etc (obv she should have done this previously).
Any other thoughts? I have said that the general consensus on here is that it is sometimes not worth the agro of taking it to court and that selling on is sometimes the better/easier/sensible option.