Cinders
Well-Known Member
Hoping some of you might be able to shed some light on this issue..
We're currently starting to look for a new horse once again as i moved off ponies onto a lovely 15.2 in august who sadly went lame 3 months later, she's hopefully going for more tests soon but her future doesn't look great and vet already thinks she'll never be rideable again.
We found a lovely sounding 15.3 and last thursday we went to view her, was a nice allrounder the been there done it type but she wasn't in full work and hadn't been competed at all this year due to her owners ill health which was the reason for sale. Rode her, popped a few jumps and took her down the road and she didn't put a foot wrong, felt totally safe on her so not wanting to let her go dad put a deposit down. She had a lump on her hind leg that owner said was caused by her mother treading on her when she was a foal but just to be on the safe side we said we'd have her vetted.
We booked a 5 stage vetting which happened yesterday and the horse was failed due to lameness. The owner who is the nicest most genuine person i've ever met, rang my dad up in tears saying the vet had been rude and aggressive towards her, he'd accused her of using lice power on the horse as he could smell it when in actually fact it was just tail spray the owner had used. He'd questioned the age and claimed the horse was a lot older than 13 despite the fact that this horse has proof of it's age and the woman has owner it for 8 years. Bit embarrassing for us as we used our own vets! Understandably i'm upset the horse failed but was ready to just move on but neither us nor the woman selling had had a vetting done so she looked up the criteria on the internet this morning and then rang us again to say she was a bit confused because our vet didn't examine the horse at all and when they trotted her up he made them do it on a down hill slope despite the fact that the horse was slipping, is it normal to do it like this?!
When the vet spoke to my dad he said any horse which isn't in full work won't pass a vetting anyway, which has left me thinking why did we bother then?! no one mentioned this before! He also said we shouldn't even consider buying this horse due to the lameness that showed up but also as it wasn't a very nice type of horse. Must say i feel a bit disheartened as we can't all afford to buy expensive flashy sport horses.
Any input greatly appreciated as i'm completely new to having vettings done. The owners sending our deposit back and i realise we can't have a horse thats showing lameness but i do feel like this horse maybe wasn't given a fair chance? Also the more i read it seems like not many horses pass flexion tests anyway?
We're currently starting to look for a new horse once again as i moved off ponies onto a lovely 15.2 in august who sadly went lame 3 months later, she's hopefully going for more tests soon but her future doesn't look great and vet already thinks she'll never be rideable again.
We found a lovely sounding 15.3 and last thursday we went to view her, was a nice allrounder the been there done it type but she wasn't in full work and hadn't been competed at all this year due to her owners ill health which was the reason for sale. Rode her, popped a few jumps and took her down the road and she didn't put a foot wrong, felt totally safe on her so not wanting to let her go dad put a deposit down. She had a lump on her hind leg that owner said was caused by her mother treading on her when she was a foal but just to be on the safe side we said we'd have her vetted.
We booked a 5 stage vetting which happened yesterday and the horse was failed due to lameness. The owner who is the nicest most genuine person i've ever met, rang my dad up in tears saying the vet had been rude and aggressive towards her, he'd accused her of using lice power on the horse as he could smell it when in actually fact it was just tail spray the owner had used. He'd questioned the age and claimed the horse was a lot older than 13 despite the fact that this horse has proof of it's age and the woman has owner it for 8 years. Bit embarrassing for us as we used our own vets! Understandably i'm upset the horse failed but was ready to just move on but neither us nor the woman selling had had a vetting done so she looked up the criteria on the internet this morning and then rang us again to say she was a bit confused because our vet didn't examine the horse at all and when they trotted her up he made them do it on a down hill slope despite the fact that the horse was slipping, is it normal to do it like this?!
When the vet spoke to my dad he said any horse which isn't in full work won't pass a vetting anyway, which has left me thinking why did we bother then?! no one mentioned this before! He also said we shouldn't even consider buying this horse due to the lameness that showed up but also as it wasn't a very nice type of horse. Must say i feel a bit disheartened as we can't all afford to buy expensive flashy sport horses.
Any input greatly appreciated as i'm completely new to having vettings done. The owners sending our deposit back and i realise we can't have a horse thats showing lameness but i do feel like this horse maybe wasn't given a fair chance? Also the more i read it seems like not many horses pass flexion tests anyway?