stangs
Well-Known Member
This has come up on the FB thread but it’s irritated me enough that I thought it deserved its own thread.
A well-known trekking centre recently “rescued” two horses from auction (and, by rescued, I mean paid 8k for them) and has been asking for 15k to help care for them.
Now people can start GoFundMes if they want to, and other people can spend their money on those GoFundMes if they really want to, but seriously?
It’s one thing saying you’ve rescued a horse from auction if you’ve paid a hundred quid for some scraggly 30 year old with one eye. It’s another thing saying you’ve ‘rescued’ a horse when you’ve paid well above what the average auction horse goes for and when the horses you’ve bought are business assets, not companion ponies who’ll never manage a job. She even admits in the GoFundMe that she was looking at these horses as assets:
And yet people are willing to pay a business to get more assets?
And, of course, the numbers they mention in the GoFundMe are ridiculously inflated - even if they are heavy horses, I seriously doubt that it costs £100 to trim them. And there’s no way that a trekking centre that must buy its feed in bulk is buying feed so expensive that each horse is costing them £10 in hard feed a day. But then again why not fabricate the numbers a little when people are clearly lapping it up?
And the other thing that seriously irritated me was this sentence:
I just despise the implication that cattle are less deserving, and that it’s fine to treat them like numbers, but that horses are too ‘magnificent’ for that sort of treatment. All animals are equally deserving of respect.
On that note, if anyone fancies donating, have at it: https://www.gofundme.com/f/our-rehabilitation-vet-costs-for-marty-big-als-recovery At least the money's helping some horses, I suppose.
A well-known trekking centre recently “rescued” two horses from auction (and, by rescued, I mean paid 8k for them) and has been asking for 15k to help care for them.
Now people can start GoFundMes if they want to, and other people can spend their money on those GoFundMes if they really want to, but seriously?
It’s one thing saying you’ve rescued a horse from auction if you’ve paid a hundred quid for some scraggly 30 year old with one eye. It’s another thing saying you’ve ‘rescued’ a horse when you’ve paid well above what the average auction horse goes for and when the horses you’ve bought are business assets, not companion ponies who’ll never manage a job. She even admits in the GoFundMe that she was looking at these horses as assets:
Could this horse be turned into a ridden horse? What was the risk? How much money and time would it take? I knew his feet would grow out but it would take both time and a fabulous farrier (which we have in Chris!)...would the leg injuries mean he might not work? Risk! But all horses get the base vetting and he'd obviously been OK….
And yet people are willing to pay a business to get more assets?
And, of course, the numbers they mention in the GoFundMe are ridiculously inflated - even if they are heavy horses, I seriously doubt that it costs £100 to trim them. And there’s no way that a trekking centre that must buy its feed in bulk is buying feed so expensive that each horse is costing them £10 in hard feed a day. But then again why not fabricate the numbers a little when people are clearly lapping it up?
And the other thing that seriously irritated me was this sentence:
Horses, the most nobel and magnificent of animals, are treated like cattle with a pen to stay in and a numbered sticky label on the bum. Just a number.
I just despise the implication that cattle are less deserving, and that it’s fine to treat them like numbers, but that horses are too ‘magnificent’ for that sort of treatment. All animals are equally deserving of respect.
On that note, if anyone fancies donating, have at it: https://www.gofundme.com/f/our-rehabilitation-vet-costs-for-marty-big-als-recovery At least the money's helping some horses, I suppose.