Endrete
Well-Known Member
I am wondering if anyone else has needed/wanted to seek a second opinion with regard to vet treatment please and your experiences?
Horse was injured in field at the beginning of June. Not lame, deep cut to cannon but not down to bone and no other structures involved. As this was meant to be a show horse vet recommended bandaging for ten weeks, twice a week, using manuka honey dressings etc in order to try to reduce likelihood of scar and white hair. All going well until week 8, tissue had filled in, no proud flesh etc.
Different vet from same practice visits to rebandage, all excited about a 'new' gel dressing he wanted to use. He advised to leave it a week before redressing as well instead of the three days. Normal vet visits to rebandage a week later and we are horrified to find that the gel dressing has pulled the wound open, causing a ridge down one side and opened the skin below and around the wound, already had proud flesh growing. He was pretty upset with it, took pics etc. He phoned other vet who said he had used it on two/three other horses without a problem. Normal vet apologised and we went back to the manuka honey dressings and twice weekly visits.
As we basically had to start from scratch the poor boy was bandaged for nearly three months. Eventually we had remove them as he was going lame, he had bandage sores and his fetlock was huge were it was rubbing. The first removal was a disaster, had to get vet back within 24 hours to give antibiotics and steroids and put bandages back on. Another two weeks later and horse is very lame, intense nursing by me allowed bandages to be removed without dramatic swelling. Xrays have shown the constant bandaging have caused small change to bone on inside of cannon. His leg is a mess, white hair growing in, ridge left on one side which was caused by dressing and his fetlock is big. I am also convinced he isnt 100% sound, vet says he is and then says he just isnt 'tracking up' properly. He definately doesnt move properly on that side. My very experienced back lady agreed with me and suggested a second opinion.
This has all been paid for by insurance - the bill is now HUGE.
I am increasingly wondering how its fair that the insurance company are footing the bill for a vet error and think maybe I should phone them to discuss?
I have expressed my dissatisfaction to my normal vet who has apolgised but wasnt sure what else to say. I have an excellent working relationship with him and dont want to upset him but I am EXTREMELY upset about the state of my horse's leg and also the fact that he just doesnt seem to be moving right. And we are now five months on.
Would you seek a second opinion before or after speaking to the insurance company? And who would you use? I will travel the country to the right vet as this horse is my pride and joy and we had big plans. This injury has definately affected his value as he stands too.
Any similiar experiences would be most welcome.
Horse was injured in field at the beginning of June. Not lame, deep cut to cannon but not down to bone and no other structures involved. As this was meant to be a show horse vet recommended bandaging for ten weeks, twice a week, using manuka honey dressings etc in order to try to reduce likelihood of scar and white hair. All going well until week 8, tissue had filled in, no proud flesh etc.
Different vet from same practice visits to rebandage, all excited about a 'new' gel dressing he wanted to use. He advised to leave it a week before redressing as well instead of the three days. Normal vet visits to rebandage a week later and we are horrified to find that the gel dressing has pulled the wound open, causing a ridge down one side and opened the skin below and around the wound, already had proud flesh growing. He was pretty upset with it, took pics etc. He phoned other vet who said he had used it on two/three other horses without a problem. Normal vet apologised and we went back to the manuka honey dressings and twice weekly visits.
As we basically had to start from scratch the poor boy was bandaged for nearly three months. Eventually we had remove them as he was going lame, he had bandage sores and his fetlock was huge were it was rubbing. The first removal was a disaster, had to get vet back within 24 hours to give antibiotics and steroids and put bandages back on. Another two weeks later and horse is very lame, intense nursing by me allowed bandages to be removed without dramatic swelling. Xrays have shown the constant bandaging have caused small change to bone on inside of cannon. His leg is a mess, white hair growing in, ridge left on one side which was caused by dressing and his fetlock is big. I am also convinced he isnt 100% sound, vet says he is and then says he just isnt 'tracking up' properly. He definately doesnt move properly on that side. My very experienced back lady agreed with me and suggested a second opinion.
This has all been paid for by insurance - the bill is now HUGE.
I am increasingly wondering how its fair that the insurance company are footing the bill for a vet error and think maybe I should phone them to discuss?
I have expressed my dissatisfaction to my normal vet who has apolgised but wasnt sure what else to say. I have an excellent working relationship with him and dont want to upset him but I am EXTREMELY upset about the state of my horse's leg and also the fact that he just doesnt seem to be moving right. And we are now five months on.
Would you seek a second opinion before or after speaking to the insurance company? And who would you use? I will travel the country to the right vet as this horse is my pride and joy and we had big plans. This injury has definately affected his value as he stands too.
Any similiar experiences would be most welcome.