skewbaldpony
Well-Known Member
about the woeful coverage, pi$$ taking and general lack of taking our medallists seriously?
I think the coverage and general approach of the presenters etc. has been fantastic. Think the BBC should be congratulated.
Don't get me wrong, I think the presentation has been fab, and the whole BBC Olympic experience unbelievable. My one gripe has been that on round ups and the evening show, the dressage medallists have been treated as a joke, and the comment has been ill informed - it's the sport's one shot at major exposure, and the general public's view seems still to be that it's 'a joke' and 'like crufts' or 'something from the circus' .
I personally believe the BBC with its brief to educate and inform, should put that right, not add to it. I don't think the likes of Gary Lineker saying 'Tally Ho' is OK - any more than it would have been OK for him to make some snide remark about northern girls getting into fights concerning the boxing gold.
However, for the record, my own answer would have been 'C' - no point! The BBC, as anyone who listens to 'Feedback' knows, is *never* wrong. They are only 'sorry you feel that way'![]()
I was just thinking of posting a thread about this!!!
Yes, I think they should.
I watched the BBC 10pm news last night, which headlined about Usain Bolt (for about 10 minutes) had a short piece about our boxing gold medalist (well deserved) a mention about the Taekwondo match (I don't think it had finished at that point, but it was well covered amongst other events) and then a quick mention to say the dressage results would be at the end of the news.
In what other sport has a GOLD AND BRONZE medal not made the headlines?
Charlotte won x2 GOLDS - same as Bolt? OK, he is exceptional in his sport (modest too!), but so is Charlotte.
I think the whole media attitude to equestrian sports in the Olympics has sucked. From the Zara bashing to the plain ignorance regarding our team's wonderful achievements. And I think this negative attitude will rub off on the public.
I've read all the comments regarding it "not being a proper sport" which have been allowed to stand on the BBC website - because, honestly, it takes more skill to kick a ball or run a bit quick doesn't it!!!
I've also read about it being elitist and beyond the reach of most sporty people. Because footballers don't get bought and sold for millions do they! And all of us on here and loaded aren't we (NOT!!!!)
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing but respect for all athletes (including footballers and sprinters etc...) but it does make you a little resentful after a while doesn't it. Why not, for a laugh, let the olympian athletes swop sports for a day! Lets see how Usain Bolt handles Alf (who has made me chuckle at how "up for it" he's been for one of the older members of the horsey olympic team - I'm sure his lap of honour was cut short in the team award ceremony when his bouncing got a little out of hand!!)
I respect anyone who can do things I can't do, across all sports.
I wish others would do the same.
Rant over. Been waiting to write this all week!!
Have some cookies for reading![]()
BBC breakfast has just had a very informative piece with Stephen Clarke trying to explain the sport of dressage. Stephen did exceptionally well to try and explain this sport in laymans terms. However I think we have to accept that dressage in particular takes many years to fully understand and the general non-horsey public are always going to struggle to understand the full extent of what was achieved by our fabulous riders. This makes it a sport difficult for the BBC to cover.
I do agree with a previous poster that Gary Linekar as a presenter has been rubbish and the BBC need to seriously re-think him ever being involved in any other sport other than football as he clearly is not interested. It was obvious Claire Balding had put a lot of effort into researching the swimming pity Gary could not widen his horizons and have a bit more personality!
BBC Breakfast have a FB page. Just type BBC Breakfast into the search box on FB and it takes you there. How many HHO can post there complaining about lack of coverage this morning about Charlotte and the rest of Team GB dressage historic medals before the BBC start deleting threads?![]()
I was just thinking of posting a thread about this!!!
Yes, I think they should.
I watched the BBC 10pm news last night, which headlined about Usain Bolt (for about 10 minutes) had a short piece about our boxing gold medalist (well deserved) a mention about the Taekwondo match (I don't think it had finished at that point, but it was well covered amongst other events) and then a quick mention to say the dressage results would be at the end of the news.To be fair, there was a full package on the dressage later in the prog, not just the results. I know because - equally outraged that it may be about to get only the one clip of pics under the presenter's link in the top story sequence - I made sure I stayed watching! Given what else happened in the Olympics yesterday in terms of first ever medal in women's boxing going to GB, and Bolt who's obviously a complete phenomenon, I think they dealt with it the right way. Reflect it at the top and do the piece later in the prog where - knowing a thing or two about how BBC news works - it will have had more room, so a longer piece. I have to say that even as a massive dressage fan, I'd probably have reached the same conclusion if I'd been editing the prog - Bolt is the biggest story of the Games, and the first ever olympic gold in a sport going to GB is massive - and "bigger" in news values than Charlotte's gold, frankly. My ulterior motive would have been that in running the dressage piece later, we'd have got more time to spend on it than if they'd squeezed it into the top story. Joe Wilson did a pretty decent job in his piece so it would have been a shame to cut it down to fit.
I can't argue with the news values / order / quantity of coverage... I do disagree with some of the lack of effort to squash the mickey taking. But I remember sailing REALLY getting that at pevious Olympics...
I was just thinking of posting a thread about this!!!
Yes, I think they should.
I watched the BBC 10pm news last night, which headlined about Usain Bolt (for about 10 minutes) had a short piece about our boxing gold medalist (well deserved) a mention about the Taekwondo match (I don't think it had finished at that point, but it was well covered amongst other events) and then a quick mention to say the dressage results would be at the end of the news.To be fair, there was a full package on the dressage later in the prog, not just the results. I know because - equally outraged that it may be about to get only the one clip of pics under the presenter's link in the top story sequence - I made sure I stayed watching! Given what else happened in the Olympics yesterday in terms of first ever medal in women's boxing going to GB, and Bolt who's obviously a complete phenomenon, I think they dealt with it the right way. Reflect it at the top and do the piece later in the prog where - knowing a thing or two about how BBC news works - it will have had more room, so a longer piece. I have to say that even as a massive dressage fan, I'd probably have reached the same conclusion if I'd been editing the prog - Bolt is the biggest story of the Games, and the first ever olympic gold in a sport going to GB is massive - and "bigger" in news values than Charlotte's gold, frankly. My ulterior motive would have been that in running the dressage piece later, we'd have got more time to spend on it than if they'd squeezed it into the top story. Joe Wilson did a pretty decent job in his piece so it would have been a shame to cut it down to fit.
I can't argue with the news values / order / quantity of coverage... I do disagree with some of the lack of effort to squash the mickey taking. But I remember sailing REALLY getting that at pevious Olympics...
I think my biggest gripe is that I feel our team GB medal winners (regardless of sport) should be the headline news. Then Bolt's achievements. Then more in depth coverage of the actual sports (dressage included). I just feel that enough credit hasn't been given to the equestrian medals in general (including putting the wrong team on the cover of newspapers!!!) and that to me does nothing to increase the sports standing to non horsey people.
The mikey taking is awful, regardless of sport. As I say, I have the upmost respect for all our athletes, been quite a proud Brit this week!!
![]()
about the woeful coverage, pi$$ taking and general lack of taking our medallists seriously?
the BBC (1) are showing Charlotte's test again now and will interview them after, so they are giving it coverage - here was the post on facebook by BD
British Dressage
The girls will be on the BBC 1 sofa from 10am, then on to Radio 2 and 5Live. They'll do some bits for nations and regions before being whisked away to TeamGB house to do the world wide press. We'll try and post links to any coverage.
Got so fed up waiting for it be dealt with last night, yes it came after some other bigger stories, but also after the 8-1 loss in a qualifier in men's hockey ! Uhm. They are happy enough to count the medals the team have won, they should give them the courtesy of a decent mention without the sarky ill-thought through comments.
Again, I have to wonder if we've been watching the same coverage.
From the moment the gold was won in Dressage yesterday it was constantly mentioned in every update on the medals for the day. I must have seen the report and subsequent reports about 10 times.