clydesdale
Well-Known Member
My mare has been diginosed with a fractured sidebone she is a clydesdale so side bone is apparently quiet common in the heavy horses was just wondering if anyone else had experiance of side bone?? 
Hi . . . Kal has it in both front feet and vet reckons it isn't contributing to his lameness (that would be the holes/lesions in his navicular bones). As I understand it, sidebones don't generally cause a problem. Any vets on here care to shed some light?
P
Polarskye you might want a second opinion.
Holes in the navicular bones are known to be a poor indicator of whether a horse will be lame, but sidebones are equally well known to cause lameness, in my own experience and reading of a lot of stuff over the years. There may be something different about your own horse that makes your vet so sure that it is not the sidebone. It is also not that likely to be the navicular either. On MRI most horses with back half of the foot lameness will be seen to have soft tissue injury which is actually the cause of the lameness. Unfotunately MRI is very expensive and many insurers will only pay half if they will pay at all.
Interesting, thank you. So when you say "soft tissue" you mean things like DDFT?
And if sidebones DO cause lameness, then what's the treatment?
Not being challenging, genuinely interested.
Thanks in advance.
P