Dizzydusty
Well-Known Member
As said in the title, this is a hypothetical question, we have strangles in our area, and its got me thinking.
If strangles is suspected and subsequently diagnosed, but yard owner fails to implement any of the usual recommended action, such as isolation, quarantine, disinfecting etc, and also knowingly allows other liveries on the yard to disregard the basic recommended action, could they be held liable for the cost of treating further sick horses? Could a livery be held liable if they knowingly deal with infected horses and then fail to carry out basic hygene rules and subsequently cause infection in other horses? Or is it a case of 'tough, your horse got sick'.
I know strangles is still a taboo subject and this post is not intended to cause argument...I was just thinking!
If strangles is suspected and subsequently diagnosed, but yard owner fails to implement any of the usual recommended action, such as isolation, quarantine, disinfecting etc, and also knowingly allows other liveries on the yard to disregard the basic recommended action, could they be held liable for the cost of treating further sick horses? Could a livery be held liable if they knowingly deal with infected horses and then fail to carry out basic hygene rules and subsequently cause infection in other horses? Or is it a case of 'tough, your horse got sick'.
I know strangles is still a taboo subject and this post is not intended to cause argument...I was just thinking!