7 August 2007 #1 K krimpatul Well-Known Member Joined 25 July 2007 Messages 86 Visit site Report available from mail@themiddlewaygroup.org.uk
10 August 2007 #2 1 18071964 New User Joined 10 August 2007 Messages 2 Visit site So the R.S.P.C.A, LACS and IFAW mislead, told half truths and relied on crap scientific data no shock to anybodies system then.
So the R.S.P.C.A, LACS and IFAW mislead, told half truths and relied on crap scientific data no shock to anybodies system then.
13 August 2007 #3 S southgate1975 Well-Known Member Joined 11 April 2007 Messages 1,415 Visit site So why do I always get poo-poohed when I ask pros for scientific evidence ?
13 August 2007 #4 S severnmiles Well-Known Member Joined 14 November 2005 Messages 10,261 Visit site Exactly for that reason, whatever side, for or against its always biased.
13 August 2007 #5 S southgate1975 Well-Known Member Joined 11 April 2007 Messages 1,415 Visit site I would submit that the science should ideally be impartial. Admittedly the users can be biased.
13 August 2007 #6 S severnmiles Well-Known Member Joined 14 November 2005 Messages 10,261 Visit site The vets/scientists are always biased either way!
31 August 2007 #7 1 18071964 New User Joined 10 August 2007 Messages 2 Visit site What Scientific evidence are you after? Cheers Charlie