HeidiPie1525
Member
Hello again! Thanks for the good advice on my other post, I’d like to take advantage of that and pose a theoretical question for you all.
You’re selling your horse (A), you’ve found another you’d like to buy (B). The stars have aligned and a buyer likes your horse and wants it vetted, you’ve tried and liked the other horse. You’re on a bit of a tight timeframe in regards to the other horse you want to buy and have got a date for that one to be vetted a few days afterwards.
Horse A passes and is bought, a should you wait for the buyer of A to have the horse a few weeks before buying B ‘just in case’? They’ve tried the horse in a professional setting (it’s at a reputable sales livery) and liked it enough to buy it.
The seller of B is a nice person but also a pro and has known you’ve got to sell A before buying B and has been patient and kind so you don’t want to mess them about. Also, you really want to get the horse home.
What should you do if the buyer of A then changes their mind? Obviously you’re a bit stuck as you’ve bought B but is it a case of ‘Caveat emptor’? Where do you stand both legally and morally?
I’d like to say this is genuinely theoretical, it hasn’t happened, but I’m worried it might. I have 2 trusted peoples opinions, one person says I should wait just in case, the other says the buyer has made a contract once the horse has been paid for and they could take horse A back to the sales livery for it to be sold for her.
I don’t want to be an a-hole, but I’ve really had a shocking year and would like to be able to have a horse so I can enjoy the rest of it. Also, nothing wrong with horse A, we just didn’t get on and it needed a better rider than me.
You’re selling your horse (A), you’ve found another you’d like to buy (B). The stars have aligned and a buyer likes your horse and wants it vetted, you’ve tried and liked the other horse. You’re on a bit of a tight timeframe in regards to the other horse you want to buy and have got a date for that one to be vetted a few days afterwards.
Horse A passes and is bought, a should you wait for the buyer of A to have the horse a few weeks before buying B ‘just in case’? They’ve tried the horse in a professional setting (it’s at a reputable sales livery) and liked it enough to buy it.
The seller of B is a nice person but also a pro and has known you’ve got to sell A before buying B and has been patient and kind so you don’t want to mess them about. Also, you really want to get the horse home.
What should you do if the buyer of A then changes their mind? Obviously you’re a bit stuck as you’ve bought B but is it a case of ‘Caveat emptor’? Where do you stand both legally and morally?
I’d like to say this is genuinely theoretical, it hasn’t happened, but I’m worried it might. I have 2 trusted peoples opinions, one person says I should wait just in case, the other says the buyer has made a contract once the horse has been paid for and they could take horse A back to the sales livery for it to be sold for her.
I don’t want to be an a-hole, but I’ve really had a shocking year and would like to be able to have a horse so I can enjoy the rest of it. Also, nothing wrong with horse A, we just didn’t get on and it needed a better rider than me.