muffinino
Well-Known Member
will they be returned to Gray?
Just put this point on the end of the Latest News big post, but wanted to know other people's views/experience. As far as I can tell, there is a distinct possibility that those horses that are deemed not to have suffered to the point of cruelty will be returned to the scumbag.
Only if unnecessary suffering can be proved, and it has to be proved for each individual horse for them to be taken off him, will the courts remove ownership. There are some horses that are in a poor condition and were in circumstances that none of us would consider at all acceptable, but physically are not so bad as to 'justify' removal of ownership.
There is a precedent to this, the case of the witch in Surrey (can't remember her name but I think the case was early last year) that had horses starving in a bare field next to fields of lush grass and hundreds of bales of hay. One pregnant mare had to be shot on site as she was too weak to stand.
I think two of the ones that were removed were eventually taken out of her ownership but others had to be returned as they were not in as bad a condition (but still extremely poor) when they were removed, if that makes sense.
Maybe an exception will be made as this is such an extreme caase but I worry that this will not happen. Having said that (this point was raised by native in Latest News) will he have the passports to prove ownership? Don't make me laugh!
Just put this point on the end of the Latest News big post, but wanted to know other people's views/experience. As far as I can tell, there is a distinct possibility that those horses that are deemed not to have suffered to the point of cruelty will be returned to the scumbag.
Only if unnecessary suffering can be proved, and it has to be proved for each individual horse for them to be taken off him, will the courts remove ownership. There are some horses that are in a poor condition and were in circumstances that none of us would consider at all acceptable, but physically are not so bad as to 'justify' removal of ownership.
There is a precedent to this, the case of the witch in Surrey (can't remember her name but I think the case was early last year) that had horses starving in a bare field next to fields of lush grass and hundreds of bales of hay. One pregnant mare had to be shot on site as she was too weak to stand.
Maybe an exception will be made as this is such an extreme caase but I worry that this will not happen. Having said that (this point was raised by native in Latest News) will he have the passports to prove ownership? Don't make me laugh!