PJB
Member
I am interested in other people's thoughts about bugrugs and whether they are adding to the problem we have with overweight and obese horses and ponies - and the EMS and laminitis that seem to be an increasing problem.
First, I should say that I am not against adding something unnatural when we take something natural away - e.g. rugging a clipped horse or one with a thin coat - bred for warmer climate - or elderly horses; using flymasks if flies are causing eye problems or (in one of my horse's cases) putting a fly mask on in hot sun to protect a pink nose from sunburn; giving minerals and vitamins to compensate for restricting their grazing to a few small acres - all well and good imo. However, I don't use a bugrug because I think flies are a natural part of a horse's environment - we don't use bugrugs on cattle or other livestock... why on horses?
I watch my two and they move much more because of flies than they do when just eating grass when there are no flies around. Their twitch muscles are flicking almost constantly and they often swing their heads around or stamp their feet to rid themselves of a particularly persistent insect. They do it naturally and calmly and I often think I am more bothered by the flies, on their behalf, than they are. I wonder if our understandable anthropomorphism (we love our horses) could be doing them harm in that their (natural) response to dealing with (natural) flies is being thwarted by the human desire to rid our animals of what WE think is upsetting to them. Could the unintended consequence be that they don't use the muscles that evolved for them to deal with it as they should, and the energy they should be using is turning into fat?
I see so many horses that are either overweight or kept on tiny starvation areas in order to keep their weight down ... and lots of horses out in bugrugs and masks that prevent the need for almost all the movement they would naturally use to avoid flies.
Thoughts?
First, I should say that I am not against adding something unnatural when we take something natural away - e.g. rugging a clipped horse or one with a thin coat - bred for warmer climate - or elderly horses; using flymasks if flies are causing eye problems or (in one of my horse's cases) putting a fly mask on in hot sun to protect a pink nose from sunburn; giving minerals and vitamins to compensate for restricting their grazing to a few small acres - all well and good imo. However, I don't use a bugrug because I think flies are a natural part of a horse's environment - we don't use bugrugs on cattle or other livestock... why on horses?
I watch my two and they move much more because of flies than they do when just eating grass when there are no flies around. Their twitch muscles are flicking almost constantly and they often swing their heads around or stamp their feet to rid themselves of a particularly persistent insect. They do it naturally and calmly and I often think I am more bothered by the flies, on their behalf, than they are. I wonder if our understandable anthropomorphism (we love our horses) could be doing them harm in that their (natural) response to dealing with (natural) flies is being thwarted by the human desire to rid our animals of what WE think is upsetting to them. Could the unintended consequence be that they don't use the muscles that evolved for them to deal with it as they should, and the energy they should be using is turning into fat?
I see so many horses that are either overweight or kept on tiny starvation areas in order to keep their weight down ... and lots of horses out in bugrugs and masks that prevent the need for almost all the movement they would naturally use to avoid flies.
Thoughts?