LankyDoodle
Well-Known Member
Lanky had his arthroscopy today.
It's really not good news at all.
He has had OCD since he was 2 years old at least, so it's really old OCD. He has so many lesions they just didn't know what to do with it. He has arthritis at a considerable level for his age and the level of work he has done. He had a meniscal tear which they sorted by removing damaged cartilage, but he also has very soft cartilage causing problems between the bones in the joint. The femur has levels of degeneration. There were other problems that were mentioned. The vet said that the problems are so severe that he has grounds to recommend destruction of the horse now, but that in the eyes of the insurer humane destruction cannot be considered until the horse is deemed to be in long-term, accute pain; the vet cannot say that he is going to be in accute, long-term pain until he's had 6 months' rest/walking out/turning out etc. He is likely to have pain on and off throughout his life, but may make a light hack if the pain can be controlled, but again, it would have to be reviewed after the 6 months.
Basically, the vet is saying that yes he could make a light hack if he has a good level of soundness after 6 months, but that the severe problems that have shown up are grounds to say that he won't come sound at all, ie will have some pain, and so on that basis he'd put down; but that in the eyes of the insurer, they want to see incurable, accute pain. And he's never ever going to do riding club stuff.
I don't actually care now. The insurer will pay for the op and treatment, and I think I have a long discussion to have with my husband because whether the insurer sees it as humane or not, itis in my eyes.
It's really not good news at all.
He has had OCD since he was 2 years old at least, so it's really old OCD. He has so many lesions they just didn't know what to do with it. He has arthritis at a considerable level for his age and the level of work he has done. He had a meniscal tear which they sorted by removing damaged cartilage, but he also has very soft cartilage causing problems between the bones in the joint. The femur has levels of degeneration. There were other problems that were mentioned. The vet said that the problems are so severe that he has grounds to recommend destruction of the horse now, but that in the eyes of the insurer humane destruction cannot be considered until the horse is deemed to be in long-term, accute pain; the vet cannot say that he is going to be in accute, long-term pain until he's had 6 months' rest/walking out/turning out etc. He is likely to have pain on and off throughout his life, but may make a light hack if the pain can be controlled, but again, it would have to be reviewed after the 6 months.
Basically, the vet is saying that yes he could make a light hack if he has a good level of soundness after 6 months, but that the severe problems that have shown up are grounds to say that he won't come sound at all, ie will have some pain, and so on that basis he'd put down; but that in the eyes of the insurer, they want to see incurable, accute pain. And he's never ever going to do riding club stuff.
I don't actually care now. The insurer will pay for the op and treatment, and I think I have a long discussion to have with my husband because whether the insurer sees it as humane or not, itis in my eyes.