PapaFrita
Well-Known Member
Personally, I think it makes sense, when one is viewing a horse, to see the owner ride it first. This is not just in case horse turns out to be a psycho, but I would generally expect the horse to go best for the person who rides it most. Course, owner might be a complete incompetent, but still.
I went to see a horse today with a friend. Owner didn't ride, nor was he asked to. This chap is a grade A showjumper and horse is up for sale for US$15,000 which is ALOT of money out her (much more than in the UK) Horse was lunged, then ridden (rather nervously) by my friend, then her instructor. He clattered rather alot of poles and I started to wonder whether he might not have jumped better with his 'dad' and whether his 'dad' was not doing him a disservice by not riding him himself.
When Antifaz was viewed, I wanted to ride him first myself, but was assured this was not necessary. Fortunately he jumped beautifully, but was quite grumpy for first 15 minutes which isn't is usual self...
What do you think?
I went to see a horse today with a friend. Owner didn't ride, nor was he asked to. This chap is a grade A showjumper and horse is up for sale for US$15,000 which is ALOT of money out her (much more than in the UK) Horse was lunged, then ridden (rather nervously) by my friend, then her instructor. He clattered rather alot of poles and I started to wonder whether he might not have jumped better with his 'dad' and whether his 'dad' was not doing him a disservice by not riding him himself.
When Antifaz was viewed, I wanted to ride him first myself, but was assured this was not necessary. Fortunately he jumped beautifully, but was quite grumpy for first 15 minutes which isn't is usual self...
What do you think?