JillA
Well-Known Member
I have been having a trimmer to my horse, and doing okay, until he developed laminitis last summer and almost foundered(PPID related). At my vets recommendation I managed to get on the books of one of the best remedial farriers in the area, and I acknowledge he probably saved my horse.
All the while preaching at me about "unregulated" BF trimmers
although he claims to also be a BF trimmer himself
Six months on and he still either comes in person or sends his qualified assistant, and last time, three or four weeks ago the heartbars C wears on the front were re-set and R had a trim, by QA, which, as with most farriers includes trimming sole
*sigh - I don't know why they do that on a flat footed TB, I have asked and not had much of an answer TBH*
Fast forward to last week - R had bruised soles and needed poulticing and C lost one of his heartbars and was lame, so after several phone calls said farrier comes in person today.
Okay so far??
So why did he insist on resetting both front heartbars? And why did he not give a reason when I asked, as though it was for him to know and me to find out?? As far as I am concerned that's an unnecessary extra set of nail holes, but there was no discussion, and when I asked what C's chances were of going BF in future he talked at me, didn't discuss, just said the bones in his feet were the wrong shape. Is that something anyone else has been told? BF trimmers?
And when I asked that R could have no sole trimmed in future, again he didn't explain why they prefer to do that, or agree that it is possible not to, just grunted and walked away.
Is it really that common that farriers ego's won't allow them to concede that owners of horses know their horses and that is as relevant as knowing about feet? And that the best way forward is working together?
(Oh, and accept that if farriers were doing such a good job how come there is a market for trimmers?? And why can't they share experience instead of defining battle lines???)
Rant over - are there any good farriers with a touch of humility in their make up? I know he is very very good at what he does, so am reluctant to go elsewhere but I could really do with him acknowledging my input.
All the while preaching at me about "unregulated" BF trimmers
Six months on and he still either comes in person or sends his qualified assistant, and last time, three or four weeks ago the heartbars C wears on the front were re-set and R had a trim, by QA, which, as with most farriers includes trimming sole
*sigh - I don't know why they do that on a flat footed TB, I have asked and not had much of an answer TBH*
Fast forward to last week - R had bruised soles and needed poulticing and C lost one of his heartbars and was lame, so after several phone calls said farrier comes in person today.
Okay so far??
So why did he insist on resetting both front heartbars? And why did he not give a reason when I asked, as though it was for him to know and me to find out?? As far as I am concerned that's an unnecessary extra set of nail holes, but there was no discussion, and when I asked what C's chances were of going BF in future he talked at me, didn't discuss, just said the bones in his feet were the wrong shape. Is that something anyone else has been told? BF trimmers?
And when I asked that R could have no sole trimmed in future, again he didn't explain why they prefer to do that, or agree that it is possible not to, just grunted and walked away.
Is it really that common that farriers ego's won't allow them to concede that owners of horses know their horses and that is as relevant as knowing about feet? And that the best way forward is working together?
(Oh, and accept that if farriers were doing such a good job how come there is a market for trimmers?? And why can't they share experience instead of defining battle lines???)
Rant over - are there any good farriers with a touch of humility in their make up? I know he is very very good at what he does, so am reluctant to go elsewhere but I could really do with him acknowledging my input.