Sarah B
Well-Known Member
Hi all, looking for a bit of advice.
3 weeks ago 4 out of the 10 horses at our yard became "itchy" with one having bald patches around the flanks/belly area. And another itching the top of his withers.
One owner (with the pony with the itchy withers) was due her vaccs anyway so walked her pony to the local surgery who diagnosed mange on the spot and gave it an injection.
Vet informed the owner that all 10 horses would need to be treated.
He visited the yard the next day and to save further costs we all agreed for him to treat the 10 at the same time. (Two of us use a diff practice). On arrival, he informed us we needed to wash all rugs, headcollars etc as it would spread, but then said the 6 horses that did not show signs did not need to be treated (although would need equipment and rugs washed).
We asked to have them all treated as precaution as they all come in contact with each other during turnout.
Not sure what he used but they were injected once, and then again 9/10 days later. All rugs washed (which you can imagine cost alot), some new rugs purcashed to cover the in between stages waiting for rugs to come back. The treatment was also a combined wormer.
The pony with the bald flanks had not improved - the patches and sore areas were spreading and ysday another pony has the same patches appearing so we rang our own practice today for second opinion.
Our vet has just been - he said they are suffering from dermatitis NOT mange/lice. However he did not inspect the other two out of the four as their owner did not know we had arranged this 2nd opinion.
So how do we stand with the imminent bill from the first vet - he has treated our horses for something which they do not have. I should add that he said the pony with the bald flanks DID have mange. No skin scrapes were taken at any time. He also insisted the mange was "within" our barn and would keep recurring.
Sorry it's so long and may seem irrelevant. Just a bit annoyed that we have forked out alot of money, taken time off work for vet visits etc.
3 weeks ago 4 out of the 10 horses at our yard became "itchy" with one having bald patches around the flanks/belly area. And another itching the top of his withers.
One owner (with the pony with the itchy withers) was due her vaccs anyway so walked her pony to the local surgery who diagnosed mange on the spot and gave it an injection.
Vet informed the owner that all 10 horses would need to be treated.
He visited the yard the next day and to save further costs we all agreed for him to treat the 10 at the same time. (Two of us use a diff practice). On arrival, he informed us we needed to wash all rugs, headcollars etc as it would spread, but then said the 6 horses that did not show signs did not need to be treated (although would need equipment and rugs washed).
We asked to have them all treated as precaution as they all come in contact with each other during turnout.
Not sure what he used but they were injected once, and then again 9/10 days later. All rugs washed (which you can imagine cost alot), some new rugs purcashed to cover the in between stages waiting for rugs to come back. The treatment was also a combined wormer.
The pony with the bald flanks had not improved - the patches and sore areas were spreading and ysday another pony has the same patches appearing so we rang our own practice today for second opinion.
Our vet has just been - he said they are suffering from dermatitis NOT mange/lice. However he did not inspect the other two out of the four as their owner did not know we had arranged this 2nd opinion.
So how do we stand with the imminent bill from the first vet - he has treated our horses for something which they do not have. I should add that he said the pony with the bald flanks DID have mange. No skin scrapes were taken at any time. He also insisted the mange was "within" our barn and would keep recurring.
Sorry it's so long and may seem irrelevant. Just a bit annoyed that we have forked out alot of money, taken time off work for vet visits etc.