Which Bits Should Be Banned And Why?

Joined
28 February 2011
Messages
16,449
Visit site
Wilkie 'Snaffles' because there is no way in high hell it's a snaffle and people use them without a true understanding of them. They are gags plain and simple and should be named as such to stop people using the excuse of - it's called a snaffle therefore it must be a nice mild bit.
 

dianchi

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 February 2007
Messages
6,125
Location
Herts
Visit site
Wilkie 'Snaffles' because there is no way in high hell it's a snaffle and people use them without a true understanding of them. They are gags plain and simple and should be named as such to stop people using the excuse of - it's called a snaffle therefore it must be a nice mild bit.

Hmmm perhaps a re-name although they are used for childrens showing ponies and actually are a very useful bit.

Echo poster about cutting peoples hands off though.............
 
Joined
28 February 2011
Messages
16,449
Visit site
Yes they are used on kids show ponies and that is what annoys me most! Giving an inexperienced set of hands a bit that exudes vast amounts of poll pressure. They fix ponies in an outline and it takes a LOT of time to reschool a pony that has been subjected to one of these. They are not dressage legal and thus should not be allowed in kids classes in the show ring.
 

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
I was thinking of normal uk type bits, but agree re some of the bizarre bits. And couldn't agree more re novice kids with wilkies, they are grossly misnamed. However I would include that under my theory of 'hands not allowed near mouth'.
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
Most of these are seldom seen these days (thank all that's holy!): twisted snaffles; twisted wire snaffles; "W" mouth snaffles; American elevator bits; mechanical hackamores.
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,168
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Nowt wrong with a twisted snaffle. I've ridden a horse who was far happier in one than his myler comfort snaffle!

They don't have to be sharp, the spiral shape helps prevent leaning and grabbing. No worse than a cherry roller or Waterford, in fact possibly nicer.
 

justabob

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 October 2012
Messages
1,157
Visit site
Any bit in the wrong hands. I have always thought that the Kimblewick was a rather unpleasant bit as it was usually used on childrens ponies in my days as a child.
 

lula

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 August 2011
Messages
1,113
Visit site
These sort of horrible things:
Bvs1Ww2k24KGrHqJjYEv12B0FPMLBMFoBbeh_12.jpg

connie-combs-gag-bit.jpg

the first one, out of interest..whats it for and why would you need 3 mouthpieces..some sort of dr Bristol? surely, you wouldnt need to go to such lengths to stop a horse getting its tounge over the bit?

the second one with its thin twisted wire mouthpiece and huge shanks looks truly horrific
 
Last edited:

lula

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 August 2011
Messages
1,113
Visit site
Waterfords.

thats interesting.

i always use to hate waterfords, thought they were terribly severe.

Ive never needed to use one myself but i know of people that have used them with success for horses that put their head down, lean on the bit and tank off so am undecided.

once again, very much depends on the hands holding the bit in question i suppose..
 

PingPongPony

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 March 2011
Messages
1,716
Visit site
the first one, out of interest..whats it for and why would you need 3 mouthpieces..some sort of dr Bristol? surely, you wouldnt need to go to such lengths to stop a horse getting its tounge over the bit?

the second one with its thin twisted wire mouthpiece and huge shanks looks truly horrific

i have no idea, i saw it being sold on ebay a while back, and i thought its horrific, i remeber there was another bit thread on here then so i posted this picture and its stayed in my photobucket. i don't know why or even how you would put this in a horses mouth :mad:
 

Lolo

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 August 2008
Messages
10,267
Visit site
Waterfords.

No one seems to know how they work, which gets me- so they use them on a horse that leans and gets very strong- ok. But then they use it badly... My sister gave me a massive lecture on that! We've used one to good effect on a pony who would grab and go, and although it wasn't great it was better than anything else!

I hate dutch gags on children's ponies. Hate them more than anything. Don't like them generally, but with kids at the other end (or novicey adults) it's even worse. I appreciate they are a fine bit in good and correct hands but the good and correct hands are a rare sight :D (and I am always desperate to put bloody roundings/ an extra rein on!)
 

dominobrown

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 March 2010
Messages
4,334
Location
North England
Visit site
I haven't got a problem with waterfords. I hunt a pointer who is meant to be awfully strong and fights a lot. In a waterford he goes very nicely on a light contact.

It horses for courses. And agree with others... its rarely the bit which causes the problem but the rider.
Same with bitless bridles... can be incredibly harsh tools in the wrong hands.

Obviously very very thin bits (wire) or anything sharp should be banned.
 

dafthoss

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 October 2010
Messages
4,808
Visit site
Lolo the amount of times I got asked why I had two reins on when I rode in a Dutch gag, it drove me insane!

I'd also like to ban bad hands.
 

Alyth

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 August 2009
Messages
870
Visit site
ROTFLMAO....ok I'll bite!!! Every bit should be banned. If everyone rode bitless and all competitions banned bits then horses would be a lot happier!!!.......'hard' hands can do less damage to a noseband than to the sensitive parts of the horses mouth!!! Rollkur wouldn't happen, nor would some of those horrific showjumping pics!!! No steel should be allowed in the head area of the horse......Let the popcorn abuse of this opinion begin!!!
 

amandaco2

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 November 2006
Messages
6,705
Location
sheffield up t'road
Visit site
Isn't the horses nose almost as sensitive?
I'm sure you could ride a horse in rolkur with a bitless bridle, and some of those look pretty severe...?
Omg at those pics....the second looks like cheese wire :-o
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,815
Location
Lincs
Visit site
The reason I hate waterfords is that the thin bars of the lower jaws sit between the nobbles. The bars are very thin and fragile. Any slight unbalance in the rider results in severe pain for the horse as the bar is caught between the nobbles. It's all well and good saying that it is fine with good hands, and most of the time, I'm sure that it is, but sadly no one can guarantee that they would never pull the bit sideways in the mouth, for example if the horse should spook or swerve. The potential for damage is too high with this bit IMO.
 

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
I think before anyone gets to hold the reins, even little kids, the bit should be placed over their elbow & gently pulled & jiggled about, & then ask them to imagine that same light pressure in their mouth, so they realise exactly how important being sensitive is.
Even though my mare used to wear a dutch gag for proper jumping, I hate them being called 3 ring snaffles. They're only a snaffle if you have one rein on the big ring. And should always have two reins. And I hate seeing kids with strong bits purely because they are over horsed. Same for adults.
As for alyths no bits argument, I've seen numpties dragging horses about & tying up in duallys, & tbh it looks every bit as unpleasant for the horse as if they did the same in a bridle. Idiots will always find a way to misuse equipment.
 
Top