Which of these is crueller?

Can you cook?


  • Total voters
    0

CARREG

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 July 2004
Messages
248
Visit site
The car hitting the fox would be accidental [hopefully]
snaring and poisening are both far more cruel methods than hunting..........Carreg
 

rrose

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 November 2005
Messages
7,622
Location
Farnham, surrey
Visit site
the fox being killed by a snare is worse than the others but only the fox being hit by the car would be accidental.

Fox hunting as a whole can be as bad as the others, the fox is chased which makes it unfair as the hunters/hounds have an advantage over the fox, and the fox may also not be killed outright.
 

Onyxia

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 May 2005
Messages
10,571
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
But point is although there is a chance the hounds wont kill it outright 9 times out of ten they will.
The other options are ALL a slow death EVERYTIME.
Is hunting with hounds kind to Mr Fox? No.Is it better then other methods? YES.
 

Hercules

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2006
Messages
342
Visit site
''Fox hunting as a whole can be as bad as the others, the fox is chased which makes it unfair as the hunters/hounds have an advantage over the fox, and the fox may also not be killed outright.''

What on earth are you talking about? You are totally wrong on all accounts.
 

Peta

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 October 2006
Messages
98
Visit site
Can we add another question?

Which organisation has been the greatest champion of snaring even before the ban?

Answer: The Countryside Alliance.
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
And who have been the biggest users of snares before and after the ban? I'll give you a little help, its not those that are keen on following hounds.
 

GinaB

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 July 2006
Messages
22,592
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
I said the fox being snared as I have seen what happens to the fox, trying to chew it's own leg etc. Not nice. I also said neither pro nor anti and the above 3 were the crulest. Reason ebnig, I know foxes need to be kept under control in the country, and I can understand the excitment of galloping crazy out int he open in pursuit. But I don't like the thought of it being killed by a pack of hounds.
 

Onyxia

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 May 2005
Messages
10,571
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
''Fox hunting as a whole can be as bad as the others, the fox is chased which makes it unfair as the hunters/hounds have an advantage over the fox, and the fox may also not be killed outright.''

What on earth are you talking about? You are totally wrong on all accounts.
No idear, wasnt me that said it.
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
Yes, I came on here as an anti but ended up accidently having a bvlazing row with the wrong person for the first few days. I've been too proud to climb down ever since.

Don't tell any one though.
 
Top